H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
María Sánchez Lorenzo vs Gloria Pizzichini H2H: 0-1
Gloria Pizzichini holds a 1–0 lead over María Sánchez Lorenzo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gloria Pizzichini leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gloria Pizzichini won the 2002 Palermo third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 50
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2002* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Gloria Pizzichini | 6-3 6-4 | María Sánchez Lorenzo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| María Sánchez Lorenzo | #1,067 | #33 | 939 | 1,727 | 127 | 180 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gloria Pizzichini | #1,139 | #45 | 500 | 1,670 | 28 | 45 | 38.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | María Sánchez Lorenzo | Gloria Pizzichini | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #89 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1995 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #200 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #117 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #72 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #52 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1999 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #41 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #90 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2000 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #97 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #732 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2001 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #214 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,574 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #111 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2003 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #42 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2004 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #259 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2005 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #83 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2006 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #141 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |