H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

María Sánchez Lorenzo vs Lourdes Domínguez Lino H2H: 0-1

Lourdes Domínguez Lino holds a 1–0 lead over María Sánchez Lorenzo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lourdes Domínguez Lino leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lourdes Domínguez Lino won the 2006 Palermo round of 32 6-3 1-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

María Sánchez Lorenzo
ESP Age 48 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Spain Age 45 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #46 6-3 1-0 (ret.) María Sánchez Lorenzo #85 Match data Jul 20, 2006* R32 Palermo Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
María Sánchez Lorenzo #1,067 #33 939 1,726 127 181 41.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #1,129 #40 1,305 1,673 125 157 44.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age María Sánchez Lorenzo Lourdes Domínguez Lino
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1994 3–4 42.9% #131 1,520 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1995 4–6 40.0% #125 1,554 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1996 4–11 26.7% #117 1,500 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 10–10 50.0% #53 1,610 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #141 1,489 0 0
20 1998 10–21 32.3% #72 1,589 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #378 1,479 0 0
21 1999 19–21 47.5% #41 1,667 0 1 2002 4–3 57.1% #390 1,518 0 0
22 2000 9–15 37.5% #97 1,605 0 1 2003 0–1 0.0% #319 1,503 0 0
23 2001 4–9 30.8% #214 1,565 0 1 2004 1–1 50.0% #208 1,508 0 0
24 2002 2–5 28.6% #111 1,518 0 1 2005 6–4 60.0% #72 1,553 0 0
25 2003 22–18 55.0% #42 1,654 0 1 2006 21–19 52.5% #52 1,623 0 1
26 2004 22–26 45.8% #51 1,639 0 1 2007 16–21 43.2% #71 1,557 0 1
27 2005 9–20 31.0% #83 1,524 0 1 2008 6–11 35.3% #91 1,507 0 1
28 2006 9–15 37.5% #141 1,518 0 1 2009 6–13 31.6% #134 1,477 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2010 2–4 33.3% #85 1,487 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2011 16–16 50.0% #79 1,574 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2012 16–16 50.0% #48 1,652 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2013 17–22 43.6% #69 1,620 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2014 7–11 38.9% #110 1,568 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2015 4–5 44.4% #100 1,550 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2016 3–8 27.3% #220 1,516 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age María Sánchez Lorenzo Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1996 1 3 4 25.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 0 4 4 0.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1998 2 7 9 22.2% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1999 7 8 15 46.7% 10 9 19 52.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2002 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
22 2000 2 6 8 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2002 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2003 8 10 18 44.4% 13 6 19 68.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2006 7 10 17 41.2% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2004 7 14 21 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 3 9 12 25.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2005 3 8 11 27.3% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — —
28 2006 5 7 12 41.7% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 1 3 4 25.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 10 8 18 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1 8 9 11.1% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 5 5 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
Career — 36 72 108 33.3% 79 84 163 48.5% 10 16 26 38.5% 2 9 11 18.2% — 27 59 86 31.4% 94 88 182 51.6% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age María Sánchez Lorenzo Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1994 1521 108.6 — — — — — +90 — 42.1% -0.53 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1995 1555 118.0 — — — — -30 +56 — 39.1% -1.39 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 102.5 -0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1996 1501 112.8 — — — — +20 +44 — 38.9% -0.81 0–6 (0%) 1–0 — +0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 1611 134.8 — — — — -125 +89 — 46.7% -0.13 4–3 (57%) 1–0 — -0.41 2000 1489 98.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.06
20 1998 1590 125.2 — — — — -121 +70 — 33.8% -1.01 5–4 (56%) 2–4 (33%) 101.8 -1.55 2001 1480 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.06
21 1999 1668 135.6 — — — — -116 +41 -94 48.9% -0.11 6–8 (43%) 6–5 (55%) 101.4 +0.29 2002 1519 112.4 — — — — — +41 — 57.1% +0.14 — 2–1 (67%) — +0.22
22 2000 1605 114.8 — — — — -69 +63 — 38.8% -0.67 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 100.9 -0.55 2003 1503 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07
23 2001 1565 109.7 — — — — — +50 — 31.0% -1.48 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.7 -1.03 2004 1509 105.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.34 1–1 0–1 — +0.01
24 2002 1518 105.3 — — — — — +47 — 37.5% -0.88 0–2 2–0 — +0.38 2005 1553 117.7 — — — — — +72 — 61.9% +0.38 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.23
25 2003 1655 128.8 +1.51 +0.27 1.122 51.8% -94 +97 -105 53.1% +0.42 9–7 (56%) 3–4 (43%) 102.9 -0.21 2006 1623 121.0 — — — — -68 +93 — 51.2% -0.30 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 102.8 +0.22
26 2004 1640 124.7 -0.83 -1.34 0.775 44.8% -96 +106 -40 44.1% -0.46 14–8 (64%) 3–5 (38%) 104.7 -2.84 2007 1558 113.3 — — — — -56 +110 — 43.2% -0.49 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -0.29
27 2005 1525 104.0 -1.84 -4.52 0.720 43.4% -42 +93 +46 33.3% -1.01 6–5 (55%) 1–4 (20%) 99.2 -0.09 2008 1508 107.1 — — — — -48 +107 — 37.8% -1.11 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.03
28 2006 1518 115.8 -2.45 -3.16 0.808 45.5% -3 +67 — 42.1% -0.61 5–6 (45%) 0–1 — -0.75 2009 1477 108.0 — — — — -35 +83 — 37.8% -0.82 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 95.2 +0.87
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1487 102.6 — — — — 0 — — 35.7% -1.36 1–1 0–1 — +0.13
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1575 121.5 — — — — -73 0 +20 50.0% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 1–7 (13%) 95.2 +0.42
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1653 124.6 — — — — -17 -96 — 54.3% +0.04 2–6 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 100.6 0.00
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1620 121.2 — — — — -86 +113 — 41.3% -0.81 10–8 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 103.9 -1.33
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1569 107.5 — — — — -102 +137 — 40.0% -0.89 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.57
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1550 113.7 -1.03 +0.35 0.984 50.1% — +126 — 50.0% -0.05 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — +0.51
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1517 97.5 -3.20 -2.29 0.761 44.1% -86 +117 — 25.0% -1.75 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.18
Career — 1727 127.6 -1.19 -2.39 0.848 46.5% -78 +73 -49 42.3% -0.51 58–54 (52%) 24–30 (44%) 103.3 -2.15 — 1674 120.0 -2.29 -1.18 0.851 46.6% -55 +78 +20 45.2% -0.48 35–45 (44%) 26–29 (47%) 98.8 +0.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.