H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
María Sánchez Lorenzo vs Miriam Oremans H2H: 1-1
María Sánchez Lorenzo and Miriam Oremans are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, María Sánchez Lorenzo leads 1–0 on clay, while Miriam Oremans leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, María Sánchez Lorenzo won the 1998 Rome second round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 53
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 1998* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | María Sánchez Lorenzo | 6-4 6-1 | Miriam Oremans | Match data |
| Aug 25, 1994* | Schenectady | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Miriam Oremans | 5-7 7-6(4) 6-3 | María Sánchez Lorenzo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| María Sánchez Lorenzo | #1,067 | #33 | 939 | 1,727 | 127 | 180 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Miriam Oremans | #193 | #25 | 585 | 1,809 | 161 | 181 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | María Sánchez Lorenzo | Miriam Oremans | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1995 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #117 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1997 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #130 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #72 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #31 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #41 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #48 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #97 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #42 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #214 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #46 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #111 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #42 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #57 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #98 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #83 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #64 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2006 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #141 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #84 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #124 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |