H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

María Sánchez Lorenzo vs Monica Seles H2H: 0-4

Monica Seles holds a 4–0 lead over María Sánchez Lorenzo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 1999 Roland Garros third round 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

María Sánchez Lorenzo
ESP Age 48 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Monica Seles
USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 30, 1999* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Monica Seles #3 6-1 6-4 María Sánchez Lorenzo #52 Match data
Jun 24, 1998* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Monica Seles #5 6-3 6-4 María Sánchez Lorenzo #72 Match data
Mar 21, 1998* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R64 Hard Monica Seles #4 6-4 6-7 6-3 María Sánchez Lorenzo #58 Match data
May 23, 1997* Madrid WTA 1000 R16 Clay Monica Seles #3 6-0 6-1 María Sánchez Lorenzo #61 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
María Sánchez Lorenzo #1,067 #33 939 1,727 127 180 41.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 578 121 82.7% 9 12 3 7 22 53

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age María Sánchez Lorenzo Monica Seles
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,600 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,002 0 1
16 1994 3–4 42.9% #131 1,521 0 0 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,295 1 10
17 1995 4–6 40.0% #125 1,554 0 0 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,443 4 20
18 1996 4–11 26.7% #117 1,500 0 0 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,499 7 30
19 1997 10–10 50.0% #53 1,636 0 0 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,485 8 32
20 1998 10–21 32.3% #72 1,599 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1999 19–21 47.5% #41 1,670 0 1 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,487 8 33
22 2000 9–15 37.5% #97 1,606 0 1 1996 43–8 84.3% #2 2,342 9 38
23 2001 4–9 30.8% #214 1,566 0 1 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,159 9 41
24 2002 2–5 28.6% #111 1,519 0 1 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,174 9 43
25 2003 22–18 55.0% #42 1,655 0 1 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,116 9 44
26 2004 22–25 46.8% #51 1,654 0 1 2000 51–12 81.0% #4 2,144 9 47
27 2005 9–20 31.0% #83 1,530 0 1 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,127 9 51
28 2006 9–15 37.5% #141 1,520 0 1 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,088 9 53
29 — — — — — — — 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,993 9 53