H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
María Sánchez Lorenzo vs Petra Langrova H2H: 0-1
Petra Langrova holds a 1–0 lead over María Sánchez Lorenzo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Petra Langrova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Petra Langrova won the 1996 Maria Lankowitz third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
TCH
Age 56
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 1996* | Maria Lankowitz | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Petra Langrova | 6-4 6-4 | María Sánchez Lorenzo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| María Sánchez Lorenzo | #1,067 | #33 | 939 | 1,727 | 127 | 180 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Petra Langrova | #895 | #53 | 453 | 1,701 | 81 | 117 | 40.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | María Sánchez Lorenzo | Petra Langrova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1995 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #117 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1997 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1998 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #72 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #80 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1999 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #41 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #86 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2000 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #97 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #134 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2001 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #214 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #111 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #106 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2003 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #42 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #137 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2004 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #66 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2005 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #83 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #133 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2006 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #141 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 |