H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
María Sánchez Lorenzo vs Sandra Cacic H2H: 2-0
María Sánchez Lorenzo holds a 2–0 lead over Sandra Cacic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, María Sánchez Lorenzo leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, María Sánchez Lorenzo won the 1999 Australian Open first round 6-2 3-3 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 51
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 1999* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | María Sánchez Lorenzo | 6-2 3-3 (ret.) | Sandra Cacic | Match data |
| Mar 20, 1998* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | María Sánchez Lorenzo | 6-3 6-3 | Sandra Cacic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| María Sánchez Lorenzo | #1,067 | #33 | 939 | 1,727 | 127 | 180 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Sandra Cacic | #409 | #39 | 548 | 1,730 | 58 | 96 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | María Sánchez Lorenzo | Sandra Cacic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1995 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #117 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1997 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #72 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #114 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #41 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2000 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #97 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #60 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2001 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #214 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #82 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #111 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #188 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2003 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #42 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2004 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #117 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2005 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #83 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #322 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2006 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #141 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #395 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |