H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

María Sánchez Lorenzo vs Tamarine Tanasugarn H2H: 2-2

María Sánchez Lorenzo and Tamarine Tanasugarn are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while María Sánchez Lorenzo leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, María Sánchez Lorenzo won the 2006 Pattaya third round 3-6 6-4 6-2.

ESP Age 48 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 2
4 main draw meetings
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 9, 2006* Pattaya WTA 250 R32 Hard María Sánchez Lorenzo #75 3-6 6-4 6-2 Tamarine Tanasugarn #147 Match data
Jun 26, 2002* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Tamarine Tanasugarn #24 5-7 6-4 6-4 María Sánchez Lorenzo #167 Match data
May 14, 1998* Berlin WTA 1000 R32 Clay María Sánchez Lorenzo #70 3-6 6-1 6-3 Tamarine Tanasugarn #39 Match data
Mar 7, 1998* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Tamarine Tanasugarn #42 6-1 4-6 7-5 María Sánchez Lorenzo #56 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
María Sánchez Lorenzo #1,067 #33 939 1,727 127 180 41.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,818 267 273 49.4% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age María Sánchez Lorenzo Tamarine Tanasugarn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1994 3–4 42.9% #131 1,521 0 0 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,482 0 0
17 1995 4–6 40.0% #125 1,554 0 0 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,492 0 0
18 1996 4–11 26.7% #117 1,500 0 0 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,478 0 0
19 1997 10–10 50.0% #53 1,636 0 0 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,609 0 0
20 1998 10–21 32.3% #72 1,599 0 0 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0
21 1999 19–21 47.5% #41 1,670 0 1 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0
22 2000 9–15 37.5% #97 1,606 0 1 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,634 0 0
23 2001 4–9 30.8% #214 1,566 0 1 2000 30–18 62.5% #28 1,787 0 0
24 2002 2–5 28.6% #111 1,519 0 1 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,697 0 0
25 2003 22–18 55.0% #42 1,655 0 1 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0
26 2004 22–25 46.8% #51 1,654 0 1 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1
27 2005 9–20 31.0% #83 1,530 0 1 2004 19–24 44.2% #66 1,623 0 1
28 2006 9–15 37.5% #141 1,520 0 1 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,503 0 1
29 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,588 0 1
30 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,570 0 1
31 2008 19–15 55.9% #37 1,702 0 2
32 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,653 0 3
33 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,734 0 4
34 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,649 0 4
35 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,594 0 4
38 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4