H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

María Sánchez Lorenzo vs Tamarine Tanasugarn H2H: 2-2

María Sánchez Lorenzo and Tamarine Tanasugarn are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while María Sánchez Lorenzo leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, María Sánchez Lorenzo won the 2006 Pattaya round of 32 3-6 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

María Sánchez Lorenzo
ESP Age 48 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
María Sánchez Lorenzo #75 3-6 6-4 6-2 Tamarine Tanasugarn #147 Match data Feb 9, 2006* R32 Pattaya Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Tamarine Tanasugarn #24 5-7 6-4 6-4 María Sánchez Lorenzo #167 Match data Jun 26, 2002* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
María Sánchez Lorenzo #70 3-6 6-1 6-3 Tamarine Tanasugarn #39 Match data May 14, 1998* R32 Berlin Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Tamarine Tanasugarn #42 6-1 4-6 7-5 María Sánchez Lorenzo #56 Match data Mar 5, 1998 R64 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
María Sánchez Lorenzo #1,067 #33 939 1,726 127 181 41.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,825 268 276 49.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age María Sánchez Lorenzo Tamarine Tanasugarn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1994 3–4 42.9% #131 1,520 0 0 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,483 0 0
17 1995 4–6 40.0% #125 1,554 0 0 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,493 0 0
18 1996 4–11 26.7% #117 1,500 0 0 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,479 0 0
19 1997 10–10 50.0% #53 1,610 0 0 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,610 0 0
20 1998 10–21 32.3% #72 1,589 0 0 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0
21 1999 19–21 47.5% #41 1,667 0 1 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0
22 2000 9–15 37.5% #97 1,605 0 1 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,633 0 0
23 2001 4–9 30.8% #214 1,565 0 1 2000 31–19 62.0% #28 1,792 0 0
24 2002 2–5 28.6% #111 1,518 0 1 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,698 0 0
25 2003 22–18 55.0% #42 1,654 0 1 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0
26 2004 22–26 45.8% #51 1,639 0 1 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1
27 2005 9–20 31.0% #83 1,524 0 1 2004 19–25 43.2% #66 1,609 0 1
28 2006 9–15 37.5% #141 1,518 0 1 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,496 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,584 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,568 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2008 19–16 54.3% #37 1,684 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,645 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,732 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,648 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,595 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age María Sánchez Lorenzo Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1996 1 3 4 25.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1995 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 0 4 4 0.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1996 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 1998 2 7 9 22.2% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1997 12 11 23 52.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1999 7 8 15 46.7% 10 9 19 52.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1998 15 12 27 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2000 2 6 8 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1999 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
23 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — 2000 19 12 31 61.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2002 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2001 18 15 33 54.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
25 2003 8 10 18 44.4% 13 6 19 68.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2002 24 16 40 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2004 7 14 21 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2003 21 16 37 56.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 2005 3 8 11 27.3% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 13 18 31 41.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2006 5 7 12 41.7% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 3 10 13 23.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 7 12 19 36.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 12 5 17 70.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 36 72 108 33.3% 79 84 163 48.5% 10 16 26 38.5% 2 9 11 18.2% — 183 185 368 49.7% 12 47 59 20.3% 67 37 104 64.4% 6 7 13 46.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 30/141 of María Sánchez Lorenzo's and 141/267 of Tamarine Tanasugarn's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age María Sánchez Lorenzo Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 2003 7/40 2.9 4.9 48.4% 72.0% 48.8% 51.0% 40.8% 60.1% 44.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2004 4/48 3.0 7.0 43.6% 63.5% 40.7% 53.8% 62.5% 50.7% 38.2% 2003 6/51 2.0 3.0 58.2% 61.2% 49.7% 35.8% 37.7% 56.3% 42.0%
27 2005 6/29 2.3 3.5 51.2% 60.0% 42.4% 42.6% 36.5% 51.0% 35.3% 2004 4/44 2.0 4.5 59.8% 53.6% 36.4% 48.4% 51.3% 46.9% 39.9%
28 2006 13/24 3.0 3.2 52.2% 60.8% 42.3% 53.4% 48.1% 51.9% 38.9% 2005 9/23 1.8 3.6 58.3% 59.8% 45.3% 40.8% 52.1% 53.8% 48.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 3/16 1.7 2.3 62.1% 59.8% 46.6% 49.0% 41.0% 55.0% 41.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 21/27 1.4 4.0 59.8% 57.8% 40.3% 47.2% 47.0% 50.7% 40.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 30/35 1.1 2.9 62.5% 63.1% 46.1% 61.7% 50.8% 56.7% 42.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 20/22 0.8 3.4 65.8% 60.5% 46.3% 57.5% 47.3% 55.3% 42.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 22/23 1.0 3.1 68.1% 58.7% 51.5% 55.0% 56.2% 56.1% 48.3%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 14/14 0.7 3.4 63.9% 56.7% 43.6% 34.9% 42.6% 51.9% 40.0%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 11/11 1.0 3.5 64.1% 52.1% 45.1% 43.9% 58.9% 49.2% 41.3%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 1/1 0.0 4.0 67.2% 51.3% 36.8% 50.0% 50.0% 46.6% 30.9%
Career — 30/308 2.8 4.2 50.0% 63.6% 43.7% 50.7% 46.0% 53.4% 39.5% — 141/544 1.1 3.3 63.2% 59.0% 45.5% 50.7% 49.7% 53.9% 43.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age María Sánchez Lorenzo Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1994 1521 108.6 — — — — — +90 — 42.1% -0.53 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — +0.17 1993 1483 96.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.17
17 1995 1555 118.0 — — — — -30 +56 — 39.1% -1.39 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 102.5 -0.49 1994 1493 103.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.83 1–1 — — +0.06
18 1996 1501 112.8 — — — — +20 +44 — 38.9% -0.81 0–6 (0%) 1–0 — +0.47 1995 1479 101.3 — — — — +23 — — 29.4% -1.53 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.8 +0.28
19 1997 1611 134.8 — — — — -125 +89 — 46.7% -0.13 4–3 (57%) 1–0 — -0.41 1996 1610 124.2 — — — — +2 — — 64.3% +1.21 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.66
20 1998 1590 125.2 — — — — -121 +70 — 33.8% -1.01 5–4 (56%) 2–4 (33%) 101.8 -1.55 1997 1648 125.4 — — — — -4 -102 +9 48.3% -0.34 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) 100.9 +1.65
21 1999 1668 135.6 — — — — -116 +41 -94 48.9% -0.11 6–8 (43%) 6–5 (55%) 101.4 +0.29 1998 1702 138.7 — — — — +13 -199 +25 48.9% -0.10 5–5 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.1 +1.91
22 2000 1605 114.8 — — — — -69 +63 — 38.8% -0.67 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 100.9 -0.55 1999 1634 113.0 — — — — -11 -165 +110 40.8% -0.57 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 99.4 +0.52
23 2001 1565 109.7 — — — — — +50 — 31.0% -1.48 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.7 -1.03 2000 1792 139.5 — — — — -52 -296 +110 59.5% +0.54 7–4 (64%) 6–7 (46%) 102.9 -1.30
24 2002 1518 105.3 — — — — — +47 — 37.5% -0.88 0–2 2–0 — +0.38 2001 1698 135.6 — — — — +14 -272 +291 51.5% +0.09 8–9 (47%) 7–6 (54%) 97.5 +2.28
25 2003 1655 128.8 +1.51 +0.27 1.122 51.8% -94 +97 -105 53.1% +0.42 9–7 (56%) 3–4 (43%) 102.9 -0.21 2002 1677 130.8 — — — — +37 -232 +254 52.5% +0.01 15–10 (60%) 7–6 (54%) 101.9 +2.48
26 2004 1640 124.7 -0.83 -1.34 0.775 44.8% -96 +106 -40 44.1% -0.46 14–8 (64%) 3–5 (38%) 104.7 -2.84 2003 1695 137.1 +0.58 -0.37 0.961 48.9% +45 -272 +201 54.7% +0.32 7–8 (47%) 5–6 (45%) 97.4 +0.78
27 2005 1525 104.0 -1.84 -4.52 0.720 43.4% -42 +93 +46 33.3% -1.01 6–5 (55%) 1–4 (20%) 99.2 -0.09 2004 1610 121.0 -2.76 -1.27 0.751 43.8% -13 -221 +320 45.7% -0.05 2–8 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 92.4 +1.55
28 2006 1518 115.8 -2.45 -3.16 0.808 45.5% -3 +67 — 42.1% -0.61 5–6 (45%) 0–1 — -0.75 2005 1497 98.5 -0.83 +0.77 1.037 50.9% -9 -166 +399 30.6% -1.35 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — +0.91
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1585 113.8 -0.78 -1.37 0.927 47.9% -34 — +318 52.8% +0.56 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.4 +0.99
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1569 117.4 -2.84 -1.65 0.822 45.7% 0 -212 — 29.8% -1.54 4–3 (57%) 2–1 (67%) 103.0 -2.05
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1684 130.6 +1.07 -0.63 0.987 49.9% -102 — +348 53.2% -0.05 5–4 (56%) 5–1 (83%) 104.5 -1.05
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1646 112.2 -0.30 -0.53 0.953 49.0% -110 -287 +344 46.9% -0.18 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.3 -0.13
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1732 129.8 +0.24 +3.07 1.101 52.2% -26 — +172 55.8% +0.65 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) 104.9 -0.51
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1648 112.1 -1.46 -2.12 0.832 45.7% -16 — — 28.6% -1.57 — — — -0.69
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1595 100.2 -3.00 -1.41 0.812 45.8% +29 — — 31.8% -1.59 1–1 1–1 — -0.01
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1577 97.4 -0.66 -2.32 0.578 38.9% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.05
Career — 1727 127.6 -1.19 -2.39 0.848 46.5% -78 +73 -49 42.3% -0.51 58–54 (52%) 24–30 (44%) 103.3 -2.15 — 1825 132.1 -0.71 -0.34 0.932 48.5% -6 -214 +226 48.6% -0.13 77–74 (51%) 52–55 (49%) 98.6 +1.57

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.