H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
María Sánchez Lorenzo vs Tatiana Panova H2H: 1-2
Tatiana Panova holds a 2–1 lead over María Sánchez Lorenzo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tatiana Panova leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Tatiana Panova won the 2001 Roland Garros first round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
154 cm / 5'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2001* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Tatiana Panova | 6-1 6-1 | María Sánchez Lorenzo | Match data |
| Mar 31, 1999* | Hilton Head | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | María Sánchez Lorenzo | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | Tatiana Panova | Match data |
| Apr 30, 1998* | Bol | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Tatiana Panova | 6-2 6-4 | María Sánchez Lorenzo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| María Sánchez Lorenzo | #1,067 | #33 | 939 | 1,727 | 127 | 180 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tatiana Panova | #1,113 | #20 | 1,270 | 1,782 | 130 | 196 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | María Sánchez Lorenzo | Tatiana Panova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1995 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #117 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #179 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1997 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #72 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #97 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #41 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #78 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #97 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #40 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #214 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #34 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #111 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #40 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #42 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #23 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #114 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #83 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #77 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2006 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #141 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #91 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |