H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Maria Strandlund Tomsvik vs Ann Grossman H2H: 0-1

Ann Grossman holds a 1–0 lead over Maria Strandlund Tomsvik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ann Grossman leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ann Grossman won the 1990 Strasbourg Open round of 32 0-6 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maria Strandlund Tomsvik
SWE
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Ann Grossman
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ann Grossman #64 0-6 6-2 6-0 Maria Strandlund Tomsvik Match data May 24, 1990* R32 Strasbourg Open Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Maria Strandlund Tomsvik — — — 1,625 42 77 35.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ann Grossman #343 #29 384 1,887 187 185 50.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Maria Strandlund Tomsvik Ann Grossman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1987 1–1 50.0% — 1,504 0 0 1987 0–1 0.0% #378 1,497 0 0
1988 6–7 46.2% — 1,578 0 0 1988 15–12 55.6% #48 1,699 0 0
1989 10–14 41.7% — 1,611 0 0 1989 23–20 53.5% #54 1,736 0 0
1990 7–16 30.4% — 1,588 0 0 1990 23–22 51.1% #50 1,748 0 0
1991 6–12 33.3% — 1,553 0 0 1991 12–19 38.7% #89 1,638 0 0
1992 0–3 0.0% — 1,520 0 0 1992 23–17 57.5% #36 1,733 0 0
1993 2–3 40.0% — 1,559 0 0 1993 30–19 61.2% #35 1,804 0 0
1994 0–2 0.0% — 1,546 0 0 1994 27–21 56.2% #37 1,853 0 0
1995 8–13 38.1% — 1,545 0 0 1995 12–19 38.7% #88 1,681 0 0
1996 2–5 28.6% — 1,526 0 0 1996 10–14 41.7% #72 1,665 0 0
1997 0–1 0.0% — 1,515 0 0 1997 10–17 37.0% #75 1,615 0 0
— — — — — — — 1998 2–4 33.3% #283 1,595 0 0

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Maria Strandlund Tomsvik Ann Grossman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1987 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1988 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 13 11 24 54.2% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
1989 4 6 10 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1989 16 11 27 59.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1990 5 9 14 35.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 9 12 21 42.9% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
1991 2 5 7 28.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1992 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1992 15 8 23 65.2% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
1993 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1993 21 12 33 63.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 16 10 26 61.5% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
1995 4 3 7 57.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1995 5 10 15 33.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1996 8 9 17 47.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
1997 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 3 9 12 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
Career 19 28 47 40.4% 14 30 44 31.8% 6 9 15 40.0% 3 10 13 23.1% Career 111 106 217 51.2% 59 56 115 51.3% 6 9 15 40.0% 11 14 25 44.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Maria Strandlund Tomsvik Ann Grossman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1987 1504 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +1.20 0–1 — — +0.37 1987 1497 101.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.15
1988 1578 125.8 — — — — +10 -8 — 45.5% -0.15 4–3 (57%) 1–2 (33%) 102.9 +0.45 1988 1699 133.9 — — — — +28 — — 54.1% +0.13 4–3 (57%) 0–5 (0%) 100.1 +0.16
1989 1612 115.4 — — — — -1 -33 — 44.3% -0.85 6–7 (46%) 1–1 — +0.30 1989 1737 136.2 — — — — +43 -89 — 52.5% +0.05 8–7 (53%) 4–5 (44%) 101.2 -1.22
1990 1589 112.6 — — — — +13 -55 — 32.7% -1.00 5–3 (63%) 0–5 (0%) 99.0 -0.92 1990 1749 136.3 — — — — -12 +8 — 51.0% +0.02 7–7 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — -1.48
1991 1554 113.6 — — — — -13 -34 +68 35.7% -0.98 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.8 -0.11 1991 1638 126.7 — — — — -16 +89 — 44.3% +0.06 3–7 (30%) 2–6 (25%) 91.9 +0.49
1992 1520 104.3 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.32 1992 1733 132.9 — — — — +24 -9 — 52.9% -0.03 6–3 (67%) 6–1 (86%) 108.7 +1.73
1993 1560 135.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.42 2–0 0–1 — -0.82 1993 1805 140.5 — — — — +9 -60 — 59.6% +0.62 6–7 (46%) 6–3 (67%) 103.6 +0.77
1994 1546 102.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — 0–2 — -0.30 1994 1853 146.2 — — — — 0 -73 -249 53.6% -0.01 10–6 (63%) 5–2 (71%) 107.3 -1.02
1995 1545 114.4 — — — — +8 -11 +27 40.8% -0.86 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — -0.97 1995 1681 123.7 — — — — +38 +44 — 40.8% -0.46 4–5 (44%) 3–9 (25%) 92.7 +0.33
1996 1527 113.8 — — — — +25 — — 33.3% -0.60 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.67 1996 1666 130.2 — — — — +49 +8 — 42.9% -0.62 4–4 (50%) 0–2 — -0.99
1997 1515 100.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.67 0–1 1–0 — +0.13 1997 1615 123.7 — — — — +26 +98 — 38.6% -1.25 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.1 -0.41
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1595 103.2 — — — — +41 +76 — 33.3% -1.58 — 1–0 — +0.11
Career 1625 123.4 — — — — +6 -29 +45 38.2% -0.87 23–24 (49%) 6–16 (27%) 97.8 -1.28 Career 1888 140.3 — — — — +18 +6 -249 49.9% -0.10 53–53 (50%) 31–39 (44%) 99.5 -0.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.