H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Maria Strandlund Tomsvik vs Emanuela Zardo H2H: 2-1
Maria Strandlund Tomsvik holds a 2–1 lead over Emanuela Zardo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Emanuela Zardo leads 1–0 on clay, while Maria Strandlund Tomsvik leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Maria Strandlund Tomsvik won the 1993 Australian Open first round 4-6 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 1993* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | 4-6 7-5 6-3 | Emanuela Zardo | Match data |
| Sep 19, 1991* | Paris | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Emanuela Zardo | 6-2 6-4 | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | Match data |
| Jun 28, 1991* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | 6-4 6-4 | Emanuela Zardo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | — | — | — | 1,626 | 42 | 77 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Emanuela Zardo | #976 | #27 | 80 | 1,765 | 69 | 74 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | Emanuela Zardo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #63 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #31 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #39 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #89 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |