H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Maria Strandlund Tomsvik vs Eugenia Maniokova H2H: 0-1

Eugenia Maniokova holds a 1–0 lead over Maria Strandlund Tomsvik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Eugenia Maniokova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Eugenia Maniokova won the 1995 Key Biscayne round of 128 6-0 6-2.

H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
RUS Age 58 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Eugenia Maniokova #160 6-0 6-2 Maria Strandlund Tomsvik Match data Mar 18, 1995* R128 Key Biscayne Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Maria Strandlund Tomsvik 1,625 42 77 35.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Eugenia Maniokova #579 #66 18 1,589 24 49 32.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Maria Strandlund Tomsvik Eugenia Maniokova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1987 1–1 50.0% 1,504 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% #274 1,483 0 0
1988 6–7 46.2% 1,578 0 0 1991 6–10 37.5% #107 1,519 0 0
1989 10–14 41.7% 1,611 0 0 1992 9–14 39.1% #87 1,546 0 0
1990 7–16 30.4% 1,588 0 0 1993 1–6 14.3% #163 1,520 0 0
1991 6–12 33.3% 1,553 0 0 1994 5–11 31.2% #116 1,510 0 0
1992 0–3 0.0% 1,520 0 0 1995 3–7 30.0% #166 1,504 0 0
1993 2–3 40.0% 1,559 0 0
1994 0–2 0.0% 1,546 0 0
1995 8–13 38.1% 1,545 0 0
1996 2–5 28.6% 1,526 0 0
1997 0–1 0.0% 1,515 0 0

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Maria Strandlund Tomsvik Eugenia Maniokova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1987 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 0 1 1 0.0%
1988 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
1989 4 6 10 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1992 2 4 6 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
1990 5 9 14 35.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
1991 2 5 7 28.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 1 2 3 33.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
1992 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
1993 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1995 4 3 7 57.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
1997 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 19 28 47 40.4% 14 30 44 31.8% 6 9 15 40.0% 3 10 13 23.1% Career 6 15 21 28.6% 8 17 25 32.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 10 14 24 41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Maria Strandlund Tomsvik Eugenia Maniokova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1987 1504 102.8 60.0% +1.20 0–1 +0.37 1990 1484 95.9 0.0% -3.50 +0.16
1988 1578 125.8 +10 -8 45.5% -0.15 4–3 (57%) 1–2 (33%) 102.9 +0.45 1991 1519 120.9 +19 +47 39.5% -0.50 3–3 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 99.5 +0.61
1989 1612 115.4 -1 -33 44.3% -0.85 6–7 (46%) 1–1 +0.30 1992 1546 114.1 +7 +35 42.3% -0.63 2–4 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 99.5 +1.40
1990 1589 112.6 +13 -55 32.7% -1.00 5–3 (63%) 0–5 (0%) 99.0 -0.92 1993 1521 113.4 -5 18.8% -2.50 1–1 1–0 -0.28
1991 1554 113.6 -13 -34 +68 35.7% -0.98 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.8 -0.11 1994 1511 109.6 +39 +36 36.1% -1.28 1–5 (17%) 2–1 (67%) 96.9 +0.01
1992 1520 104.3 14.3% -2.57 0–1 -0.32 1995 1504 108.5 +37 +25 33.3% -1.38 2–2 (50%) -0.04
1993 1560 135.6 33.3% -1.42 2–0 0–1 -0.82
1994 1546 102.3 0.0% -2.25 0–2 -0.30
1995 1545 114.4 +8 -11 +27 40.8% -0.86 3–4 (43%) 1–1 -0.97
1996 1527 113.8 +25 33.3% -0.60 0–1 1–2 (33%) +0.67
1997 1515 100.1 33.3% -2.67 0–1 1–0 +0.13
Career 1625 123.4 +6 -29 +45 38.2% -0.87 23–24 (49%) 6–16 (27%) 97.8 -1.28 Career 1590 117.4 +17 +37 36.3% -1.06 9–15 (38%) 8–7 (53%) 98.1 +2.55

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.