H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Maria Strandlund Tomsvik vs Laura Garrone H2H: 1-0
Maria Strandlund Tomsvik holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Garrone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maria Strandlund Tomsvik leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Maria Strandlund Tomsvik won the 1988 Bastad third round 2-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 58
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 1988* | Bastad | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | 2-6 6-3 6-2 | Laura Garrone | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | — | — | — | 1,626 | 42 | 77 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Laura Garrone | #262 | #32 | 90 | 1,726 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | Laura Garrone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #203 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #38 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #86 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #93 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #156 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #167 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #194 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #258 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #224 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |