H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Maria Strandlund Tomsvik vs Sabine Hack H2H: 0-2
Sabine Hack holds a 2–0 lead over Maria Strandlund Tomsvik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sabine Hack leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sabine Hack won the 1995 Jakarta semifinal 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 1995* | Jakarta | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Sabine Hack | 6-0 6-1 | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | Match data |
| Jul 29, 1989* | Bastad | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Sabine Hack | 6-2 6-3 | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | — | — | — | 1,626 | 42 | 77 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sabine Hack | #523 | #13 | 577 | 1,996 | 180 | 135 | 57.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | Sabine Hack | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 5–1 | 83.3% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #262 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #146 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #74 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #45 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #59 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #35 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 |
| 1995 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #24 | 1,854 | 0 | 3 |
| 1996 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #19 | 1,831 | 0 | 4 |
| 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #40 | 1,729 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #43 | 1,706 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #523 | 1,648 | 0 | 5 |