H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Maria Strandlund Tomsvik vs Silke Meier H2H: 1-2
Silke Meier holds a 2–1 lead over Maria Strandlund Tomsvik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Silke Meier leads 2–0 on clay, while Maria Strandlund Tomsvik leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Maria Strandlund Tomsvik won the 1995 Wimbledon first round 7-5 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 58
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 1995* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | 7-5 6-0 | Silke Meier | Match data |
| Jul 9, 1992* | Kitzbuhel | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Silke Meier | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | Match data |
| Jul 12, 1990* | Bastad | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Silke Meier | 7-6 6-0 | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | — | — | — | 1,626 | 42 | 77 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Silke Meier | #948 | #40 | 101 | 1,667 | 81 | 141 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | Silke Meier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #50 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #132 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #138 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #80 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #151 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #113 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #91 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #205 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |