H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Maria Strandlund Tomsvik vs Silke Meier H2H: 1-2

Silke Meier holds a 2–1 lead over Maria Strandlund Tomsvik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Silke Meier leads 2–0 on clay, while Maria Strandlund Tomsvik leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Maria Strandlund Tomsvik won the 1995 Wimbledon round of 128 7-5 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maria Strandlund Tomsvik
SWE
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Silke Meier
GER Age 58 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Maria Strandlund Tomsvik 7-5 6-0 Silke Meier #106 Match data Jun 28, 1995* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Silke Meier #117 4-6 6-3 6-4 Maria Strandlund Tomsvik Match data Jul 9, 1992* R32 Kitzbuhel Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Silke Meier #119 7-6 6-0 Maria Strandlund Tomsvik Match data Jul 12, 1990* R32 Bastad Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Maria Strandlund Tomsvik — — — 1,625 42 77 35.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Silke Meier #948 #40 101 1,666 81 141 36.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Maria Strandlund Tomsvik Silke Meier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1987 1–1 50.0% — 1,504 0 0 1985 3–3 50.0% #164 1,511 0 0
1988 6–7 46.2% — 1,578 0 0 1986 10–10 50.0% #85 1,594 0 0
1989 10–14 41.7% — 1,611 0 0 1987 10–13 43.5% #50 1,591 0 0
1990 7–16 30.4% — 1,588 0 0 1988 8–16 33.3% #99 1,589 0 0
1991 6–12 33.3% — 1,553 0 0 1989 7–14 33.3% #148 1,553 0 0
1992 0–3 0.0% — 1,520 0 0 1990 6–13 31.6% #132 1,529 0 0
1993 2–3 40.0% — 1,559 0 0 1991 4–9 30.8% #138 1,510 0 0
1994 0–2 0.0% — 1,546 0 0 1992 10–13 43.5% #80 1,585 0 0
1995 8–13 38.1% — 1,545 0 0 1993 6–16 27.3% #151 1,520 0 0
1996 2–5 28.6% — 1,526 0 0 1994 5–9 35.7% #113 1,527 0 0
1997 0–1 0.0% — 1,515 0 0 1995 10–14 41.7% #91 1,533 0 0
— — — — — — — 1996 2–10 16.7% #205 1,488 0 0
— — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% #234 1,482 0 0

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Maria Strandlund Tomsvik Silke Meier
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1987 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
1988 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 2 2 4 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7%
1989 4 6 10 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1987 5 4 9 55.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
1990 5 9 14 35.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 0 5 5 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
1991 2 5 7 28.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 0 4 4 0.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
1992 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1990 3 2 5 60.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
1993 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 1 2 3 33.3% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
1995 4 3 7 57.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1993 2 3 5 40.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1994 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
1997 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 2 5 7 28.6% 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 2 3 5 40.0% 0 7 7 0.0% — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career 19 28 47 40.4% 14 30 44 31.8% 6 9 15 40.0% 3 10 13 23.1% Career 19 33 52 36.5% 47 76 123 38.2% 2 7 9 22.2% 10 24 34 29.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Maria Strandlund Tomsvik Silke Meier
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1987 1504 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +1.20 0–1 — — +0.37 1985 1512 104.5 — — — — — — — 46.2% +0.15 1–0 0–1 — +0.25
1988 1578 125.8 — — — — +10 -8 — 45.5% -0.15 4–3 (57%) 1–2 (33%) 102.9 +0.45 1986 1594 114.1 — — — — +37 -79 — 49.0% +0.08 5–4 (56%) 1–2 (33%) — +2.33
1989 1612 115.4 — — — — -1 -33 — 44.3% -0.85 6–7 (46%) 1–1 — +0.30 1987 1591 118.2 — — — — +67 -85 — 44.4% -0.61 6–4 (60%) 2–0 — +0.51
1990 1589 112.6 — — — — +13 -55 — 32.7% -1.00 5–3 (63%) 0–5 (0%) 99.0 -0.92 1988 1590 121.7 — — — — -66 +3 — 36.5% -1.14 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.89
1991 1554 113.6 — — — — -13 -34 +68 35.7% -0.98 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.8 -0.11 1989 1553 105.5 — — — — -80 +44 — 38.5% -0.92 4–6 (40%) 2–4 (33%) 96.0 +1.12
1992 1520 104.3 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.32 1990 1529 108.7 — — — — -25 -7 — 30.8% -1.31 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 96.9 -0.10
1993 1560 135.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.42 2–0 0–1 — -0.82 1991 1511 102.1 — — — — -36 +2 — 31.3% -1.13 4–2 (67%) 0–2 — +0.55
1994 1546 102.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — 0–2 — -0.30 1992 1585 122.9 — — — — -101 +40 — 45.6% -0.18 5–6 (45%) 1–1 — +1.05
1995 1545 114.4 — — — — +8 -11 +27 40.8% -0.86 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — -0.97 1993 1520 105.5 — — — — -11 +5 — 31.4% -1.53 3–4 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 100.0 +0.19
1996 1527 113.8 — — — — +25 — — 33.3% -0.60 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.67 1994 1528 101.6 — — — — -51 +33 — 34.5% -1.14 1–0 1–0 — +0.23
1997 1515 100.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.67 0–1 1–0 — +0.13 1995 1534 112.4 — — — — -61 +42 — 42.4% -0.52 6–5 (55%) 1–3 (25%) 101.7 +1.06
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1488 107.5 — — — — +7 -8 — 21.4% -2.00 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.31
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1482 — — — — — — — — — — — — — -0.14
Career 1625 123.4 — — — — +6 -29 +45 38.2% -0.87 23–24 (49%) 6–16 (27%) 97.8 -1.28 Career 1667 116.0 — — — — -20 +5 — 38.4% -0.83 41–38 (52%) 15–23 (39%) 102.4 +2.64

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.