H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Maria Teresa Nasuelli vs Wendy Overton H2H: 0-2
Wendy Overton holds a 2–0 lead over Maria Teresa Nasuelli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Wendy Overton leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Wendy Overton won the 1972 US Open second round 6-1 1-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 1972* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Wendy Overton | 6-1 1-6 6-2 | Maria Teresa Nasuelli | Match data |
| Aug 12, 1971* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Wendy Overton | 6-0 6-4 | Maria Teresa Nasuelli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Teresa Nasuelli | — | — | — | 1,622 | 66 | 98 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Wendy Overton | — | — | — | 1,920 | 123 | 142 | 46.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Maria Teresa Nasuelli | Wendy Overton | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 1969 | 14–8 | 63.6% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 2 | 1969 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 1970 | 8–14 | 36.4% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 1971 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 1972 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 3 | 1972 | 40–30 | 57.1% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 3 | 1973 | 14–23 | 37.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 3 | 1974 | 12–18 | 40.0% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 7–11 | 38.9% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 3 | 1975 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,855 | 0 | 0 |
| 1976 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | 1976 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |