H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Maria Vento-Kabchi vs Anne Kremer H2H: 1-0
Maria Vento-Kabchi holds a 1–0 lead over Anne Kremer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maria Vento-Kabchi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Vento-Kabchi won the 2004 Athens Olympics second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
VEN
Age 52
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
LUX
Age 50
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2004* | Athens Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Hard | Maria Vento-Kabchi | 6-3 6-4 | Anne Kremer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Vento-Kabchi | #996 | #26 | 1,053 | 1,718 | 97 | 158 | 38.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Anne Kremer | #1,039 | #18 | 1,265 | 1,810 | 148 | 185 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Vento-Kabchi | Anne Kremer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #551 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #242 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #166 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #86 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #139 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #74 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #51 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #31 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #43 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #33 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1999 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #110 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2000 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #104 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #25 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2001 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #155 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #401 | 1,635 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #94 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2003 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #44 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #165 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2004 | 19–27 | 41.3% | #48 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,524 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2005 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #62 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #82 | 1,517 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2006 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #324 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #265 | 1,460 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #331 | 1,474 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #238 | 1,462 | 0 | 2 |