H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Maria Vento-Kabchi vs Barbara Rittner H2H: 2-0
Maria Vento-Kabchi holds a 2–0 lead over Barbara Rittner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Maria Vento-Kabchi leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Vento-Kabchi won the 2002 Doha third round 7-5 4-6 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
VEN
Age 52
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2002* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Maria Vento-Kabchi | 7-5 4-6 7-6(5) | Barbara Rittner | Match data |
| Feb 15, 2001* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Maria Vento-Kabchi | 7-6(5) 6-7(2) 6-3 | Barbara Rittner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Vento-Kabchi | #996 | #26 | 1,053 | 1,716 | 95 | 156 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Barbara Rittner | #438 | #24 | 661 | 1,883 | 209 | 217 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Vento-Kabchi | Barbara Rittner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #551 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #29 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1994 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #166 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #34 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1995 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #86 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #40 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #139 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1997 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #51 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1998 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #43 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #71 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1999 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #110 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #66 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2000 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2001 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #155 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #99 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #68 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2003 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #44 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #66 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2004 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #48 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2005 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #62 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #235 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2006 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #324 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |