H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Maria Vento-Kabchi vs Chanda Rubin H2H: 1-1
Maria Vento-Kabchi and Chanda Rubin are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Chanda Rubin leads 1–0 on carpet, while Maria Vento-Kabchi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Vento-Kabchi won the 2003 US Open first round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
VEN
Age 52
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2003* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Maria Vento-Kabchi | 6-4 6-4 | Chanda Rubin | Match data |
| Oct 25, 1997* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Chanda Rubin | 6-4 6-1 | Maria Vento-Kabchi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Vento-Kabchi | #996 | #26 | 1,053 | 1,716 | 95 | 156 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Chanda Rubin | #1,122 | #6 | 2,554 | 2,047 | 343 | 231 | 59.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Vento-Kabchi | Chanda Rubin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #526 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #84 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #70 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #551 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #23 | 1,804 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #15 | 1,945 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #166 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 20–9 | 69.0% | #17 | 1,989 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #86 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #32 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #139 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #35 | 1,800 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1997 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #51 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #22 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1998 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #43 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #13 | 1,910 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1999 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #110 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,806 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2000 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #13 | 1,958 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2001 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #155 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #9 | 1,917 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #52 | 1,860 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2003 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #44 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #545 | 1,823 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2004 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #48 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #486 | 1,719 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 2005 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #62 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2006 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #324 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |