H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Maria Vento-Kabchi vs Emmanuelle Gagliardi H2H: 2-1
Maria Vento-Kabchi holds a 2–1 lead over Emmanuelle Gagliardi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Emmanuelle Gagliardi leads 1–0 on clay, while Maria Vento-Kabchi leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Maria Vento-Kabchi won the 2003 Bali quarterfinal 1-6 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
VEN
Age 52
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 50
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2003* | Bali | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Maria Vento-Kabchi | 1-6 6-1 6-1 | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | Match data |
| Feb 17, 2000* | Sao Paulo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | 6-4 6-3 | Maria Vento-Kabchi | Match data |
| Jun 23, 1999* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Maria Vento-Kabchi | 7-5 6-3 | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Vento-Kabchi | #996 | #26 | 1,053 | 1,716 | 95 | 156 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Emmanuelle Gagliardi | #736 | #42 | 781 | 1,695 | 117 | 182 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Vento-Kabchi | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #551 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #166 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #78 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #86 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #101 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #139 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #51 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #95 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #43 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #69 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #110 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #61 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #56 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #155 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #105 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #44 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #115 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2004 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #48 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #131 | 1,409 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2005 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #62 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #261 | 1,401 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2006 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #324 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |