H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Maria Vento-Kabchi vs Fang Li H2H: 0-1
Fang Li holds a 1–0 lead over Maria Vento-Kabchi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fang Li leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fang Li won the 1997 Tokyo fourth round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
VEN
Age 52
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 1997* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Fang Li | 7-5 6-2 | Maria Vento-Kabchi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Vento-Kabchi | #996 | #26 | 1,053 | 1,716 | 95 | 156 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Fang Li | #488 | #36 | 723 | 1,705 | 67 | 89 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Maria Vento-Kabchi | Fang Li | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #551 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #119 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #166 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #86 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #139 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #51 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #43 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #110 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #155 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #503 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #488 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #44 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #48 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #62 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #324 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |