H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Maria Vento-Kabchi vs Katerina Maleeva H2H: 0-2
Katerina Maleeva holds a 2–0 lead over Maria Vento-Kabchi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Katerina Maleeva leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Katerina Maleeva won the 1996 Oklahoma third round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
VEN
Age 52
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
BUL
Age 57
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 1996* | Oklahoma | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Katerina Maleeva | 6-3 6-0 | Maria Vento-Kabchi | Match data |
| Oct 21, 1994* | Brighton | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Katerina Maleeva | 6-4 5-7 6-4 | Maria Vento-Kabchi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Vento-Kabchi | #996 | #26 | 1,053 | 1,716 | 95 | 156 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Katerina Maleeva | #456 | #6 | 116 | 2,070 | 324 | 185 | 63.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Vento-Kabchi | Katerina Maleeva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,813 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #29 | 1,838 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #551 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #13 | 1,948 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,992 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1994 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #166 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 32–11 | 74.4% | #15 | 1,940 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1995 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #86 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,039 | 0 | 9 |
| 22 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #139 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,967 | 0 | 10 |
| 23 | 1997 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #51 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,906 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 1998 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #43 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #22 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 |
| 25 | 1999 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #110 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,866 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 2000 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #302 | 1,679 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 2001 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #155 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #231 | 1,686 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2003 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #44 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #48 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #62 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2006 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #324 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |