H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Maria Vento-Kabchi vs Larisa Savchenko H2H: 1-0
Maria Vento-Kabchi holds a 1–0 lead over Larisa Savchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maria Vento-Kabchi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Vento-Kabchi won the 1998 Key Biscayne second round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
VEN
Age 52
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
URS
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 1998* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Maria Vento-Kabchi | 7-5 6-3 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Vento-Kabchi | #996 | #26 | 1,053 | 1,716 | 95 | 156 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,926 | 238 | 239 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Maria Vento-Kabchi | Larisa Savchenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #551 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #166 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #86 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #139 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #51 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #43 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #110 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,887 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #155 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #44 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 2004 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #48 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 |
| 2005 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #62 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 2006 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #324 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |