H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Maria Vento-Kabchi vs Lourdes Domínguez Lino H2H: 0-1

Lourdes Domínguez Lino holds a 1–0 lead over Maria Vento-Kabchi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lourdes Domínguez Lino leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lourdes Domínguez Lino won the 2006 Indian Wells Open round of 128 6-4 1-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maria Vento-Kabchi
VEN Age 52 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Spain Age 45 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #54 6-4 1-6 6-1 Maria Vento-Kabchi #71 Match data Mar 7, 2006* R128 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Maria Vento-Kabchi #996 #26 1,053 1,718 97 158 38.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #1,129 #40 1,305 1,673 125 157 44.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maria Vento-Kabchi Lourdes Domínguez Lino
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 0–1 0.0% #551 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% #141 1,489 0 0
20 1994 3–6 33.3% #166 1,520 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #378 1,479 0 0
21 1995 5–8 38.5% #86 1,551 0 0 2002 4–3 57.1% #390 1,518 0 0
22 1996 1–6 14.3% #139 1,504 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #319 1,503 0 0
23 1997 11–7 61.1% #51 1,630 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #208 1,508 0 0
24 1998 11–18 37.9% #43 1,652 0 0 2005 6–4 60.0% #72 1,553 0 0
25 1999 3–16 15.8% #110 1,534 0 0 2006 21–19 52.5% #52 1,623 0 1
26 2000 8–15 34.8% #104 1,546 0 0 2007 16–21 43.2% #71 1,557 0 1
27 2001 4–7 36.4% #155 1,540 0 0 2008 6–11 35.3% #91 1,507 0 1
28 2002 2–4 33.3% #172 1,517 0 0 2009 6–13 31.6% #134 1,477 0 1
29 2003 15–8 65.2% #44 1,717 0 0 2010 2–4 33.3% #85 1,487 0 1
30 2004 19–27 41.3% #48 1,637 0 0 2011 16–16 50.0% #79 1,574 0 2
31 2005 13–23 36.1% #62 1,574 0 0 2012 16–16 50.0% #48 1,652 0 2
32 2006 2–12 14.3% #324 1,462 0 0 2013 17–22 43.6% #69 1,620 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2014 7–11 38.9% #110 1,568 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2015 4–5 44.4% #100 1,550 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2016 3–8 27.3% #220 1,516 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Maria Vento-Kabchi Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1994 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1995 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2002 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
22 1996 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1997 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2004 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1998 5 7 12 41.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2005 — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1999 1 7 8 12.5% 0 6 6 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2006 7 10 17 41.2% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2000 7 6 13 53.8% 0 6 6 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2007 3 9 12 25.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2001 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — —
28 2002 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 1 3 4 25.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2003 8 5 13 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2004 13 18 31 41.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 2005 6 14 20 30.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2012 10 8 18 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 2006 1 8 9 11.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2013 1 8 9 11.1% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 5 5 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
Career — 57 87 144 39.6% 9 33 42 21.4% 16 20 36 44.4% 15 18 33 45.5% — 27 59 86 31.4% 94 88 182 51.6% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Maria Vento-Kabchi Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1992 1497 102.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1489 98.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.06
20 1994 1520 126.6 — — — — +36 — — 39.1% -0.17 2–3 (40%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.12 2001 1480 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.06
21 1995 1551 125.8 — — — — +28 — — 47.1% -0.09 2–6 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.2 -0.02 2002 1519 112.4 — — — — — +41 — 57.1% +0.14 — 2–1 (67%) — +0.22
22 1996 1504 101.6 — — — — +49 — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 1–0 — -0.04 2003 1503 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07
23 1997 1630 124.6 — — — — +10 — +13 55.6% +0.22 2–0 1–0 — +1.99 2004 1509 105.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.34 1–1 0–1 — +0.01
24 1998 1652 129.3 — — — — -18 -132 +32 41.8% -0.54 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 98.4 -0.76 2005 1553 117.7 — — — — — +72 — 61.9% +0.38 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.23
25 1999 1535 107.0 — — — — +27 -89 — 22.7% -2.05 2–4 (33%) 1–1 — -0.38 2006 1623 121.0 — — — — -68 +93 — 51.2% -0.30 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 102.8 +0.22
26 2000 1547 118.9 — — — — +90 -168 +71 34.0% -1.09 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 98.1 -0.49 2007 1558 113.3 — — — — -56 +110 — 43.2% -0.49 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -0.29
27 2001 1540 115.9 — — — — +107 — — 33.3% -1.33 2–0 2–2 (50%) — -0.46 2008 1508 107.1 — — — — -48 +107 — 37.8% -1.11 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.03
28 2002 1518 110.8 — — — — +115 — — 30.8% -0.92 1–0 1–0 — +0.10 2009 1477 108.0 — — — — -35 +83 — 37.8% -0.82 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 95.2 +0.87
29 2003 1717 136.1 -0.61 +1.41 0.957 49.2% +34 — -78 62.0% +0.86 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.33 2010 1487 102.6 — — — — 0 — — 35.7% -1.36 1–1 0–1 — +0.13
30 2004 1638 126.5 -2.36 +1.05 0.849 46.3% +7 -231 -55 42.9% -0.59 6–7 (46%) 4–5 (44%) 97.6 -0.18 2011 1575 121.5 — — — — -73 0 +20 50.0% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 1–7 (13%) 95.2 +0.42
31 2005 1575 117.2 -1.22 -0.89 0.872 47.0% -9 -131 +34 34.6% -1.30 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 106.1 +0.18 2012 1653 124.6 — — — — -17 -96 — 54.3% +0.04 2–6 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 100.6 0.00
32 2006 1462 91.7 -2.62 -2.46 0.809 45.0% +1 -51 — 25.0% -1.94 0–4 (0%) — — +0.53 2013 1620 121.2 — — — — -86 +113 — 41.3% -0.81 10–8 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 103.9 -1.33
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1569 107.5 — — — — -102 +137 — 40.0% -0.89 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.57
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1550 113.7 -1.03 +0.35 0.984 50.1% — +126 — 50.0% -0.05 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — +0.51
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1517 97.5 -3.20 -2.29 0.761 44.1% -86 +117 — 25.0% -1.75 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.18
Career — 1718 127.6 -1.90 -0.81 0.852 46.4% +24 -143 +3 39.4% -0.79 31–40 (44%) 21–22 (49%) 99.6 +0.20 — 1674 120.0 -2.29 -1.18 0.851 46.6% -55 +78 +20 45.2% -0.48 35–45 (44%) 26–29 (47%) 98.8 +0.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.