H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Maria Vento-Kabchi vs Nathalie Tauziat H2H: 1-4

Nathalie Tauziat holds a 4–1 lead over Maria Vento-Kabchi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Nathalie Tauziat leads 2–0 on clay, while Maria Vento-Kabchi leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nathalie Tauziat won the 2000 US Open second round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maria Vento-Kabchi
VEN Age 52 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Nathalie Tauziat
FRA Age 58 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nathalie Tauziat #8 6-3 6-1 Maria Vento-Kabchi #102 Match data Aug 22, 2000 R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Nathalie Tauziat #12 7-5 3-6 7-6 Maria Vento-Kabchi #32 Match data May 22, 1998* R16 Strasbourg Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Nathalie Tauziat #11 6-4 6-1 Maria Vento-Kabchi #33 Match data Apr 1, 1998* R64 Hilton Head Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Maria Vento-Kabchi #62 6-4 6-3 Nathalie Tauziat #19 Match data Oct 24, 1997* R16 Quebec City Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet
Nathalie Tauziat #20 6-1 4-6 7-5 Maria Vento-Kabchi #116 Match data Jun 28, 1995* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Maria Vento-Kabchi #996 #26 1,053 1,718 97 158 38.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nathalie Tauziat #126 #3 2,562 2,033 548 333 62.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maria Vento-Kabchi Nathalie Tauziat
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1984 0–1 0.0% #296 1,499 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1985 3–3 50.0% #112 1,539 0 0
18 1992 0–1 0.0% #551 1,496 0 0 1986 12–17 41.4% #66 1,643 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1987 32–20 61.5% #25 1,821 0 0
20 1994 3–6 33.3% #166 1,520 0 0 1988 31–20 60.8% #26 1,849 0 0
21 1995 5–8 38.5% #86 1,551 0 0 1989 32–19 62.7% #25 1,875 0 0
22 1996 1–6 14.3% #139 1,504 0 0 1990 46–20 69.7% #18 1,962 0 1
23 1997 11–7 61.1% #51 1,630 0 0 1991 38–20 65.5% #13 1,987 0 1
24 1998 11–18 37.9% #43 1,652 0 0 1992 39–20 66.1% #14 1,934 0 1
25 1999 3–16 15.8% #110 1,534 0 0 1993 41–18 69.5% #18 1,975 0 2
26 2000 8–15 34.8% #104 1,546 0 0 1994 29–21 58.0% #35 1,850 0 2
27 2001 4–7 36.4% #155 1,540 0 0 1995 27–19 58.7% #27 1,845 0 3
28 2002 2–4 33.3% #172 1,517 0 0 1996 30–22 57.7% #22 1,799 0 3
29 2003 15–8 65.2% #44 1,717 0 0 1997 40–21 65.6% #11 1,977 0 4
30 2004 19–27 41.3% #48 1,637 0 0 1998 41–23 64.1% #10 2,025 0 4
31 2005 13–23 36.1% #62 1,574 0 0 1999 37–23 61.7% #7 1,988 0 6
32 2006 2–12 14.3% #324 1,462 0 0 2000 36–25 59.0% #10 1,869 0 7
33 — — — — — — — 2001 34–21 61.8% #13 1,864 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Maria Vento-Kabchi Nathalie Tauziat
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 12 8 20 60.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6%
20 1994 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1988 16 8 24 66.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
21 1995 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1989 17 9 26 65.4% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 1996 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1990 18 7 25 72.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 6 19 68.4%
23 1997 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1991 14 8 22 63.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 5 15 66.7%
24 1998 5 7 12 41.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1992 14 8 22 63.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 4 12 66.7%
25 1999 1 7 8 12.5% 0 6 6 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1993 20 8 28 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2%
26 2000 7 6 13 53.8% 0 6 6 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1994 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5%
27 2001 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1995 9 9 18 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 2 11 81.8% 2 4 6 33.3%
28 2002 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1996 11 9 20 55.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
29 2003 8 5 13 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1997 12 8 20 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 11 2 13 84.6% 11 7 18 61.1%
30 2004 13 18 31 41.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1998 15 9 24 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 14 7 21 66.7%
31 2005 6 14 20 30.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 7 9 16 43.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 14 6 20 70.0%
32 2006 1 8 9 11.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2000 14 11 25 56.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 13 7 20 65.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 19 11 30 63.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 4 8 50.0%
Career — 57 87 144 39.6% 9 33 42 21.4% 16 20 36 44.4% 15 18 33 45.5% — 212 137 349 60.7% 107 75 182 58.8% 109 43 152 71.7% 120 78 198 60.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Maria Vento-Kabchi Nathalie Tauziat
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1500 112.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.27
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1540 107.2 — — — — — +22 — 46.7% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.17
18 1992 1497 102.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.16 1986 1643 133.1 — — — — -35 -75 -21 46.4% -0.09 3–8 (27%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.66
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1821 143.9 — — — — -37 -85 -163 55.4% +0.15 14–5 (74%) 5–2 (71%) — -1.28
20 1994 1520 126.6 — — — — +36 — — 39.1% -0.17 2–3 (40%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.12 1988 1850 146.7 — — — — +37 -107 -227 56.3% +0.59 12–5 (71%) 6–4 (60%) — -1.09
21 1995 1551 125.8 — — — — +28 — — 47.1% -0.09 2–6 (25%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.02 1989 1876 150.1 — — — — +23 -64 -230 57.9% +0.68 10–4 (71%) 9–5 (64%) — -2.99
22 1996 1504 101.6 — — — — +49 — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 1–0 — -0.04 1990 1962 157.1 — — — — +20 -109 -164 63.2% +0.99 16–4 (80%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.16
23 1997 1630 124.6 — — — — +10 — +13 55.6% +0.22 2–0 1–0 — +1.99 1991 1987 160.0 — — — — +41 -51 -179 61.7% +0.77 11–5 (69%) 8–8 (50%) — -2.67
24 1998 1652 129.3 — — — — -18 -132 +32 41.8% -0.54 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.76 1992 1935 154.0 — — — — +33 -15 +4 61.8% +0.83 12–6 (67%) 7–5 (58%) — -0.30
25 1999 1535 107.0 — — — — +27 -89 — 22.7% -2.05 2–4 (33%) 1–1 — -0.38 1993 1976 158.3 — — — — +42 -98 +43 62.9% +0.80 13–5 (72%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.82
26 2000 1547 118.9 — — — — +90 -168 +71 34.0% -1.09 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.49 1994 1851 144.9 — — — — +28 -21 +122 56.9% +0.60 8–8 (50%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.62
27 2001 1540 115.9 — — — — +107 — — 33.3% -1.33 2–0 2–2 (50%) — -0.46 1995 1845 146.3 — — — — -43 +7 +204 57.1% +0.38 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) — -1.26
28 2002 1518 110.8 — — — — +115 — — 30.8% -0.92 1–0 1–0 — +0.10 1996 1800 152.0 — — — — -33 +40 +313 58.3% +0.73 6–10 (38%) 7–1 (88%) — -1.06
29 2003 1717 136.1 -0.61 +1.41 0.957 49.2% +34 — -78 62.0% +0.86 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.33 1997 1977 157.1 — — — — -43 -149 +209 60.7% +0.51 15–8 (65%) 12–7 (63%) — -0.76
30 2004 1638 126.5 -2.36 +1.05 0.849 46.3% +7 -231 -55 42.9% -0.59 6–7 (46%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.18 1998 2026 161.2 — — — — 0 -297 +207 58.7% +0.74 16–6 (73%) 7–7 (50%) — +0.49
31 2005 1575 117.2 -1.22 -0.89 0.872 47.0% -9 -131 +34 34.6% -1.30 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.18 1999 1988 153.0 — — — — +7 -271 +186 58.7% +0.52 13–12 (52%) 5–7 (42%) — +0.18
32 2006 1462 91.7 -2.62 -2.46 0.809 45.0% +1 -51 — 25.0% -1.94 0–4 (0%) — — +0.53 2000 1870 151.2 — — — — +43 -148 +295 56.9% +0.40 12–10 (55%) 9–3 (75%) — +4.24
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1865 149.8 — — — — 0 -190 +392 57.1% +0.37 15–10 (60%) 14–4 (78%) — +2.32
Career — 1718 127.6 -1.90 -0.81 0.852 46.4% +24 -143 +3 39.4% -0.79 31–40 (44%) 21–22 (49%) 99.6 +0.20 — 2034 158.4 — — — — +9 -87 +99 58.5% +0.58 185–113 (62%) 111–82 (58%) 106.0 -0.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.