H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Maria Vento-Kabchi vs Sandrine Testud H2H: 0-1
Sandrine Testud holds a 1–0 lead over Maria Vento-Kabchi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sandrine Testud leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandrine Testud won the 1999 Indian Wells second round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
VEN
Age 52
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 1999* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Sandrine Testud | 6-1 6-1 | Maria Vento-Kabchi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Vento-Kabchi | #996 | #26 | 1,053 | 1,716 | 95 | 156 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sandrine Testud | #1,203 | #9 | 2,233 | 2,019 | 309 | 236 | 56.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Vento-Kabchi | Sandrine Testud | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #551 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #109 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #166 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #106 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #86 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #100 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #139 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #81 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #51 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #41 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #43 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #110 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #14 | 1,938 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2000 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 51–26 | 66.2% | #14 | 1,946 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2001 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #155 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,916 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2003 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #44 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,976 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2004 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #48 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #38 | 1,845 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2005 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #62 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2006 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #324 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #313 | 1,739 | 0 | 3 |