H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Maria Vento-Kabchi vs Virginia Ruano Pascual H2H: 0-1
Virginia Ruano Pascual holds a 1–0 lead over Maria Vento-Kabchi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Virginia Ruano Pascual leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Virginia Ruano Pascual won the 2004 Birmingham second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
VEN
Age 52
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2004* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Virginia Ruano Pascual | 6-2 6-3 | Maria Vento-Kabchi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Vento-Kabchi | #996 | #26 | 1,053 | 1,716 | 95 | 156 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Virginia Ruano Pascual | #998 | #28 | 893 | 1,819 | 199 | 235 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Vento-Kabchi | Virginia Ruano Pascual | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #194 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #551 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #137 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #126 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #166 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #86 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #61 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #139 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #87 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #51 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #52 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1998 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #43 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1999 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #110 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #85 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2000 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2001 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #155 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #56 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #65 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2003 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #44 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #55 | 1,694 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2004 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #48 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #64 | 1,646 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2005 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #62 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #107 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2006 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #324 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #66 | 1,659 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #81 | 1,630 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #107 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #200 | 1,621 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 |