H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Maria Vento-Kabchi vs Virginia Ruano Pascual H2H: 0-1

Virginia Ruano Pascual holds a 1–0 lead over Maria Vento-Kabchi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Virginia Ruano Pascual leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Virginia Ruano Pascual won the 2004 Birmingham round of 64 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maria Vento-Kabchi
VEN Age 52 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Virginia Ruano Pascual
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Virginia Ruano Pascual #69 6-2 6-3 Maria Vento-Kabchi #33 Match data Jun 9, 2004* R64 Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Maria Vento-Kabchi #996 #26 1,053 1,718 97 158 38.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Virginia Ruano Pascual #998 #28 893 1,818 200 236 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maria Vento-Kabchi Virginia Ruano Pascual
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #307 1,481 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1991 2–2 50.0% #194 1,500 0 0
18 1992 0–1 0.0% #551 1,496 0 0 1992 1–4 20.0% #137 1,493 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1993 6–10 37.5% #126 1,515 0 0
20 1994 3–6 33.3% #166 1,520 0 0 1994 0–4 0.0% #171 1,476 0 0
21 1995 5–8 38.5% #86 1,551 0 0 1995 11–13 45.8% #61 1,562 0 0
22 1996 1–6 14.3% #139 1,504 0 0 1996 9–16 36.0% #87 1,578 0 0
23 1997 11–7 61.1% #51 1,630 0 0 1997 18–10 64.3% #52 1,732 0 1
24 1998 11–18 37.9% #43 1,652 0 0 1998 22–16 57.9% #32 1,776 0 2
25 1999 3–16 15.8% #110 1,534 0 0 1999 12–16 42.9% #85 1,660 0 2
26 2000 8–15 34.8% #104 1,546 0 0 2000 8–8 50.0% #89 1,645 0 2
27 2001 4–7 36.4% #155 1,540 0 0 2001 13–18 41.9% #56 1,607 0 2
28 2002 2–4 33.3% #172 1,517 0 0 2002 19–21 47.5% #65 1,634 0 2
29 2003 15–8 65.2% #44 1,717 0 0 2003 19–17 52.8% #55 1,694 0 3
30 2004 19–27 41.3% #48 1,637 0 0 2004 12–16 42.9% #64 1,645 0 3
31 2005 13–23 36.1% #62 1,574 0 0 2005 10–18 35.7% #107 1,557 0 3
32 2006 2–12 14.3% #324 1,462 0 0 2006 15–13 53.6% #66 1,659 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2007 11–14 44.0% #81 1,629 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2008 9–12 42.9% #107 1,621 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2009 3–5 37.5% #200 1,621 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 2010 0–2 0.0% #998 1,592 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Maria Vento-Kabchi Virginia Ruano Pascual
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1994 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1995 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1996 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1996 4 6 10 40.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1997 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1997 1 2 3 33.3% 16 7 23 69.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 1998 5 7 12 41.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1998 6 6 12 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1999 1 7 8 12.5% 0 6 6 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1999 6 4 10 60.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2000 7 6 13 53.8% 0 6 6 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2000 3 4 7 42.9% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — —
27 2001 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2001 5 7 12 41.7% 7 10 17 41.2% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2002 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 4 8 12 33.3% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 2003 8 5 13 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2003 15 9 24 62.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 2004 13 18 31 41.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2004 5 11 16 31.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
31 2005 6 14 20 30.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2005 7 10 17 41.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 2006 1 8 9 11.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2006 10 8 18 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 6 7 13 46.2% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 57 87 144 39.6% 9 33 42 21.4% 16 20 36 44.4% 15 18 33 45.5% — 78 95 173 45.1% 103 113 216 47.7% 15 18 33 45.5% 4 10 14 28.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 23/119 of Maria Vento-Kabchi's and 79/176 of Virginia Ruano Pascual's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Maria Vento-Kabchi Virginia Ruano Pascual
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
29 2003 2/23 0.0 3.5 59.6% 54.0% 39.1% 36.1% 50.5% 48.1% 49.6% 2003 3/36 0.3 2.3 72.9% 53.4% 41.5% 68.2% 37.0% 50.4% 38.7%
30 2004 5/46 0.8 8.2 58.9% 55.1% 34.5% 42.5% 45.5% 46.5% 45.4% 2004 8/28 1.3 3.4 70.2% 57.8% 52.2% 52.1% 47.3% 56.2% 48.0%
31 2005 8/36 0.6 4.1 65.3% 55.7% 44.9% 41.3% 45.7% 51.8% 42.0% 2005 3/28 0.3 4.0 62.4% 50.3% 35.5% 47.1% 46.7% 45.6% 48.7%
32 2006 8/14 0.6 6.0 58.9% 55.8% 40.3% 44.6% 32.6% 49.4% 40.9% 2006 16/28 0.6 1.5 71.4% 54.8% 47.0% 44.4% 44.7% 52.4% 43.4%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 20/25 0.7 2.3 70.3% 56.4% 42.0% 44.3% 49.5% 52.0% 41.7%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 19/21 0.4 1.9 71.2% 54.2% 42.7% 44.4% 41.5% 51.2% 43.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 8/8 0.5 2.0 71.2% 53.0% 46.4% 49.2% 50.5% 51.5% 41.2%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 2/2 0.0 3.5 72.4% 48.4% 22.6% 44.9% 66.7% 41.2% 33.3%
Career — 23/255 0.6 5.6 61.2% 55.5% 40.5% 42.2% 41.5% 49.5% 43.0% — 79/436 0.6 2.2 70.7% 54.8% 43.9% 46.7% 46.3% 51.7% 43.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Maria Vento-Kabchi Virginia Ruano Pascual
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1482 96.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -3.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.18
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1500 99.8 — — — — — +51 — 44.4% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.24
18 1992 1497 102.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.16 1992 1494 108.5 — — — — — +57 — 20.0% -2.30 — — — -0.36
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1515 112.1 — — — — +6 +45 — 38.9% -0.81 2–2 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 100.6 +0.39
20 1994 1520 126.6 — — — — +36 — — 39.1% -0.17 2–3 (40%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.12 1994 1477 97.0 — — — — — — — 11.1% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.02
21 1995 1551 125.8 — — — — +28 — — 47.1% -0.09 2–6 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.2 -0.02 1995 1563 122.2 — — — — -80 +84 — 44.9% -0.47 1–4 (20%) 4–0 (100%) 101.8 +0.72
22 1996 1504 101.6 — — — — +49 — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 1–0 — -0.04 1996 1579 126.8 — — — — -49 +24 — 41.5% -0.58 1–6 (14%) 3–0 (100%) — -0.54
23 1997 1630 124.6 — — — — +10 — +13 55.6% +0.22 2–0 1–0 — +1.99 1997 1733 134.8 — — — — -201 +46 — 59.7% +0.73 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 103.6 +0.26
24 1998 1652 129.3 — — — — -18 -132 +32 41.8% -0.54 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 98.4 -0.76 1998 1776 128.0 — — — — -190 +21 -133 52.5% +0.08 8–2 (80%) 3–3 (50%) 105.0 +0.47
25 1999 1535 107.0 — — — — +27 -89 — 22.7% -2.05 2–4 (33%) 1–1 — -0.38 1999 1660 125.0 — — — — +3 -16 — 46.0% -0.25 4–5 (44%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.07
26 2000 1547 118.9 — — — — +90 -168 +71 34.0% -1.09 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 98.1 -0.49 2000 1645 110.8 — — — — -9 +3 — 50.0% -0.22 4–4 (50%) 0–2 — +0.51
27 2001 1540 115.9 — — — — +107 — — 33.3% -1.33 2–0 2–2 (50%) — -0.46 2001 1607 125.9 — — — — +10 -10 — 45.8% -0.06 3–7 (30%) 3–4 (43%) 92.5 -0.34
28 2002 1518 110.8 — — — — +115 — — 30.8% -0.92 1–0 1–0 — +0.10 2002 1634 125.4 — — — — -64 +48 — 51.6% +0.16 4–9 (31%) 5–4 (56%) 95.9 +0.57
29 2003 1717 136.1 -0.61 +1.41 0.957 49.2% +34 — -78 62.0% +0.86 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.33 2003 1695 119.9 -0.97 -0.92 0.780 45.2% +1 -67 — 51.9% -0.21 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 100.9 +0.46
30 2004 1638 126.5 -2.36 +1.05 0.849 46.3% +7 -231 -55 42.9% -0.59 6–7 (46%) 4–5 (44%) 97.6 -0.18 2004 1646 113.0 +0.06 +0.93 1.096 52.2% -62 +26 -34 46.0% -0.48 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) 95.3 -0.60
31 2005 1575 117.2 -1.22 -0.89 0.872 47.0% -9 -131 +34 34.6% -1.30 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 106.1 +0.18 2005 1558 111.3 -2.34 +0.61 0.895 47.0% -10 +41 +17 43.7% -0.70 4–11 (27%) 5–4 (56%) 95.2 -0.27
32 2006 1462 91.7 -2.62 -2.46 0.809 45.0% +1 -51 — 25.0% -1.94 0–4 (0%) — — +0.53 2006 1660 123.5 -1.95 +0.13 0.913 47.7% -22 -29 -79 53.3% -0.22 2–2 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 101.6 +0.27
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1630 114.4 -2.70 -1.70 0.870 47.0% +1 -49 0 47.3% -0.16 3–4 (43%) 2–5 (29%) 96.3 +0.25
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1622 110.7 -3.08 -0.59 0.894 47.2% -6 -63 +17 41.7% -0.65 4–2 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 99.8 -0.37
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1621 116.1 -1.29 -1.20 0.849 46.4% -17 -30 — 35.3% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.67
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1592 94.6 -3.08 -1.43 0.568 37.4% — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — 0.00
Career — 1718 127.6 -1.90 -0.81 0.852 46.4% +24 -143 +3 39.4% -0.79 31–40 (44%) 21–22 (49%) 99.6 +0.20 — 1819 126.4 -2.15 -0.62 0.891 47.4% -34 +18 -37 47.2% -0.29 56–75 (43%) 46–39 (54%) 97.4 +0.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.