H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Mariana Diaz-Oliva vs Amanda Hopmans H2H: 1-0

Mariana Diaz-Oliva holds a 1–0 lead over Amanda Hopmans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mariana Diaz-Oliva leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mariana Diaz-Oliva won the 2000 Palermo round of 16 6-2 6-2.

ARG Age 50 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
NED Age 50 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mariana Diaz-Oliva #164 6-2 6-2 Amanda Hopmans #82 Match data Jul 14, 2000* R16 Palermo Tier IV modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mariana Diaz-Oliva #452 #42 696 1,652 86 130 39.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Amanda Hopmans #978 #72 411 1,603 23 36 39.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mariana Diaz-Oliva Amanda Hopmans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 1996 0–1 0.0% #140 1,485 0 0
21 1997 2–7 22.2% #106 1,455 0 0
22 1998 6–9 40.0% #95 1,470 0 0
23 1999 9–11 45.0% #107 1,510 0 0 1999 9–13 40.9% #83 1,549 0 0
24 2000 4–8 33.3% #112 1,499 0 0 2000 12–16 42.9% #103 1,538 0 0
25 2001 18–22 45.0% #55 1,548 0 0 2001 2–7 22.2% #162 1,518 0 0
26 2002 11–15 42.3% #89 1,567 0 1
27 2003 4–4 50.0% #172 1,581 0 1
28 2004 5–10 33.3% #102 1,539 0 1
29 2005 22–23 48.9% #58 1,606 0 1
30 2006 5–20 20.0% #192 1,460 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mariana Diaz-Oliva Amanda Hopmans
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 1996 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1997 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 1 1 2 50.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
24 2000 1 2 3 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 2000 3 5 8 37.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2001 4 8 12 33.3% 14 12 26 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 2001 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2002 4 7 11 36.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
28 2004 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 2005 8 11 19 42.1% 12 10 22 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0%
30 2006 3 10 13 23.1% 2 8 10 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 24 52 76 31.6% 58 68 126 46.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 5 10 15 33.3% 9 17 26 34.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mariana Diaz-Oliva Amanda Hopmans
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 1996 1486 100.0 33.3% -0.67 0–1 +0.07
21 1997 1456 102.2 +55 25.0% -1.38 0–2 0–2 +0.10
22 1998 1471 104.3 +8 +58 43.3% -0.47 1–1 3–3 (50%) +1.39
23 1999 1511 99.1 +15 41.3% -0.44 5–1 (83%) 3–2 (60%) 105.7 +1.34 1999 1549 120.0 +66 -49 +37 40.4% -0.70 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 98.1 -0.43
24 2000 1500 102.9 -35 +12 33.3% -0.89 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.0 +0.33 2000 1539 112.0 +42 -22 +11 49.2% -0.03 2–5 (29%) 1–4 (20%) 93.0 +1.81
25 2001 1548 115.4 -74 +72 42.7% -0.76 7–4 (64%) 4–1 (80%) 108.0 -0.32 2001 1518 107.4 +27 -16 25.0% -2.00 1–1 0–1 -0.79
26 2002 1568 108.2 -86 +51 46.4% -0.36 2–4 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 95.3 -0.04
27 2003 1581 107.7 +98 37.5% -0.06 2–0 1–2 (33%) +0.45
28 2004 1540 108.8 -1.83 -0.74 0.856 46.7% -69 +94 32.4% -1.12 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 102.8 -0.24
29 2005 1606 122.7 -1.27 +1.04 0.989 50.0% -69 +54 -120 48.4% -0.26 7–4 (64%) 6–6 (50%) 106.4 -0.48
30 2006 1460 104.0 -4.32 -0.65 0.866 46.5% +14 +88 28.8% -1.46 2–9 (18%) 2–5 (29%) 90.3 0.00
Career 1653 112.9 -3.15 -0.20 0.897 47.5% -53 +56 -120 40.3% -0.68 31–30 (51%) 25–31 (45%) 100.1 +1.21 1604 115.7 +47 -30 +24 42.1% -0.59 5–9 (36%) 2–7 (22%) 91.2 +1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.