H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Mariana Diaz-Oliva vs Conchita Martínez Granados H2H: 0-1
Conchita Martínez Granados holds a 1–0 lead over Mariana Diaz-Oliva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Conchita Martínez Granados leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Conchita Martínez Granados won the 2006 Roland Garros first round 6-4 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 50
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 50
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2006* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Conchita Martínez Granados | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | Mariana Diaz-Oliva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mariana Diaz-Oliva | #452 | #42 | 696 | 1,654 | 86 | 129 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Conchita Martínez Granados | #587 | #66 | 538 | 1,579 | 29 | 48 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mariana Diaz-Oliva | Conchita Martínez Granados | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #106 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1998 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #110 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #107 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #204 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2001 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #55 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #89 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #98 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #107 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2004 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #102 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #150 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2005 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #58 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2006 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #192 | 1,460 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #321 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |