H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mariana Diaz-Oliva vs Laurence Courtois H2H: 0-1
Laurence Courtois holds a 1–0 lead over Mariana Diaz-Oliva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laurence Courtois leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Laurence Courtois won the 1999 Palermo fourth round 2-6 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 50
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 50
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 1999* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Laurence Courtois | 2-6 6-2 7-5 | Mariana Diaz-Oliva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mariana Diaz-Oliva | #452 | #42 | 696 | 1,654 | 86 | 129 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Laurence Courtois | #484 | #37 | 565 | 1,719 | 74 | 93 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mariana Diaz-Oliva | Laurence Courtois | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #105 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #44 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #106 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #183 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #125 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #107 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #78 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #130 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #55 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #166 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #89 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2004 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #102 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2005 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #58 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2006 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #192 | 1,460 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |