H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mariana Diaz-Oliva vs Seda Noorlander H2H: 1-0
Mariana Diaz-Oliva holds a 1–0 lead over Seda Noorlander in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mariana Diaz-Oliva leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mariana Diaz-Oliva won the 2000 Sao Paulo third round 7-6(3) 4-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 50
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 52
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2000* | Sao Paulo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Mariana Diaz-Oliva | 7-6(3) 4-6 7-5 | Seda Noorlander | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mariana Diaz-Oliva | #452 | #42 | 696 | 1,654 | 86 | 129 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Seda Noorlander | #892 | #80 | 393 | 1,540 | 24 | 56 | 30.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mariana Diaz-Oliva | Seda Noorlander | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #306 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #106 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1998 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #200 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #107 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #114 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #55 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #80 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #89 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #100 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2004 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #102 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #166 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2005 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #58 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2006 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #192 | 1,460 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #342 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |