H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Mariana Diaz-Oliva vs Zuzana Ondraskova H2H: 0-2
Zuzana Ondraskova holds a 2–0 lead over Mariana Diaz-Oliva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Zuzana Ondraskova leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Zuzana Ondraskova won the 2006 Prague third round 4-6 7-6(6) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 50
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 46
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2006* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Zuzana Ondraskova | 4-6 7-6(6) 6-3 | Mariana Diaz-Oliva | Match data |
| May 14, 2005* | Prague | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Zuzana Ondraskova | 7-5 6-2 | Mariana Diaz-Oliva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mariana Diaz-Oliva | #452 | #42 | 696 | 1,654 | 86 | 129 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Zuzana Ondraskova | #1,140 | #74 | 811 | 1,595 | 31 | 67 | 31.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mariana Diaz-Oliva | Zuzana Ondraskova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #106 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #129 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #107 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #88 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #55 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #89 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #108 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2004 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #102 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2005 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #58 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2006 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #192 | 1,460 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #83 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #438 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1107 | 1,426 | 0 | 0 |