H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer vs Bettina Fulco H2H: 1-0
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer holds a 1–0 lead over Bettina Fulco in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer won the 1994 Wimbledon first round 6-2 5-7 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 1994* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 6-2 5-7 6-2 | Bettina Fulco | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Bettina Fulco | #770 | #23 | 197 | 1,873 | 139 | 152 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Bettina Fulco | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #116 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #40 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #24 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #47 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #131 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #83 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #290 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #142 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #133 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |