H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer vs Halle Cioffi H2H: 4-0
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer holds a 4–0 lead over Halle Cioffi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer won the 1991 San Diego third round 0-6 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 1991* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 0-6 6-1 6-1 | Halle Cioffi | Match data |
| Jul 29, 1989* | Schenectady | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 6-2 6-0 | Halle Cioffi | Match data |
| Nov 7, 1986* | Little Rock | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 6-1 6-4 | Halle Cioffi | Match data |
| Jul 14, 1985* | Key Biscayne 2 | WTA 250 | F | — | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 6-2 6-4 | Halle Cioffi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Halle Cioffi | #767 | #31 | 26 | 1,765 | 88 | 98 | 47.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Halle Cioffi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #147 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #47 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #50 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #111 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #95 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #348 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |