H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer vs Kate Gompert H2H: 0-1
Kate Gompert holds a 1–0 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kate Gompert leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kate Gompert won the 1986 San Diego third round 2-6 6-4 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 1986* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Kate Gompert | 2-6 6-4 7-6 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kate Gompert | #316 | #18 | 34 | 1,870 | 85 | 81 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Kate Gompert | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #98 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 11–8 | 57.9% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #35 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #22 | 1,829 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #175 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #301 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |