H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer vs Kimberly Po Messerli H2H: 0-4
Kimberly Po Messerli holds a 4–0 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Kimberly Po Messerli leads 2–0 on carpet and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimberly Po Messerli won the 1996 Oakland fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
Age 54
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 1996* | Oakland | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Kimberly Po Messerli | 6-4 6-4 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
| Aug 14, 1996* | Manhattan Beach | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Kimberly Po Messerli | 6-4 3-6 6-2 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
| Apr 19, 1996* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Kimberly Po Messerli | 6-2 6-2 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
| Nov 12, 1993* | Philadelphia | WTA 1000 | R16 | Carpet | Kimberly Po Messerli | 6-1 4-6 6-3 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimberly Po Messerli | — | — | — | 1,878 | 118 | 133 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Kimberly Po Messerli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 20–19 | 51.3% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 11–17 | 39.3% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 4–13 | 23.5% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 20–13 | 60.6% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 27–20 | 57.4% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |