H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Marianne Werdel Witmeyer vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 0-3

Kimiko Date Krumm holds a 3–0 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date Krumm leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 1996 Key Biscayne third round 6-0 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marianne Werdel Witmeyer
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 24, 1996* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R32 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-0 6-0 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer Match data
Mar 22, 1995* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 QF Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-1 7-5 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer Match data
Mar 14, 1993* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R64 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-1 7-5 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer — — — 1,849 181 203 47.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Marianne Werdel Witmeyer Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
1985 6–3 66.7% — 1,542 0 1 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
1986 13–10 56.5% — 1,683 0 1 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
1987 10–17 37.0% — 1,659 0 1 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
1988 11–20 35.5% — 1,588 0 1 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
1989 13–17 43.3% — 1,593 0 1 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
1990 18–18 50.0% — 1,746 0 1 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
1991 21–19 52.5% — 1,740 0 1 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
1992 13–17 43.3% — 1,697 0 1 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
1993 21–18 53.8% — 1,748 0 1 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
1994 22–22 50.0% — 1,772 0 1 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
1995 20–18 52.6% — 1,780 0 1 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
1996 8–18 30.8% — 1,663 0 1 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
1997 5–4 55.6% — 1,672 0 1 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
— — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
— — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8