H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer vs Laura Arraya H2H: 0-2
Laura Arraya holds a 2–0 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Laura Arraya leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laura Arraya won the 1992 Australian Open first round 6-4 6-7(1) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
PER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 1992* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Laura Arraya | 6-4 6-7(1) 6-1 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
| Jul 30, 1989* | Schenectady | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Laura Arraya | 6-4 6-3 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 4 |
| 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 |
| 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 |
| 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 8 |
| 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 |
| 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 |
| 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 |
| 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 |
| 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 |
| 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,734 | 0 | 10 |
| 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,683 | 0 | 10 |
| 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |