H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer vs Linda Ferrando H2H: 2-0
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer holds a 2–0 lead over Linda Ferrando in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer won the 1992 Schenectady third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 1992* | Schenectady | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 6-2 6-1 | Linda Ferrando | Match data |
| Aug 24, 1990* | Schenectady | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 6-4 6-4 | Linda Ferrando | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Linda Ferrando | #474 | #36 | 42 | 1,734 | 87 | 101 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Linda Ferrando | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #221 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #154 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #67 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #44 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #67 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #474 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |