H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer vs Mariaan De Swardt H2H: 0-2
Mariaan De Swardt holds a 2–0 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mariaan De Swardt leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mariaan De Swardt won the 1996 Indian Wells second round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Age 55
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 1996* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Mariaan De Swardt | 6-4 7-5 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
| Sep 1, 1994* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Mariaan De Swardt | 6-4 2-6 7-6 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mariaan De Swardt | — | — | — | 1,784 | 65 | 81 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Mariaan De Swardt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 10–8 | 55.6% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 17–10 | 63.0% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |