H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer vs Mercedes Paz H2H: 3-1
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer holds a 3–1 lead over Mercedes Paz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mercedes Paz won the 1996 Wimbledon first round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 60
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 1996* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Mercedes Paz | 6-4 6-4 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
| Aug 22, 1991* | Schenectady | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 4-6 6-2 7-6 | Mercedes Paz | Match data |
| Nov 1, 1990* | Oakland | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Mercedes Paz | Match data |
| Aug 25, 1990* | Schenectady | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 4-6 7-5 6-3 | Mercedes Paz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mercedes Paz | #521 | #28 | 185 | 1,822 | 144 | 182 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Mercedes Paz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #115 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,776 | 0 | 3 |
| 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #71 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 |
| 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #107 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #213 | 1,495 | 0 | 3 |
| 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #140 | 1,476 | 0 | 3 |
| 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,452 | 0 | 3 |
| 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #124 | 1,442 | 0 | 3 |
| 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |