H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer vs Monique Javer H2H: 2-1
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer holds a 2–1 lead over Monique Javer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Marianne Werdel Witmeyer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Monique Javer won the 1993 Eastbourne second round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 58
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 1993* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Monique Javer | 6-4 7-5 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
| Jun 24, 1992* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 6-2 4-6 6-0 | Monique Javer | Match data |
| Apr 12, 1991* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 6-2 2-6 6-1 | Monique Javer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Monique Javer | #746 | #56 | 20 | 1,685 | 63 | 105 | 37.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Monique Javer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #168 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #159 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #73 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #111 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #104 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #112 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #72 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #185 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #779 | 1,510 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |