H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer vs Nana Smith H2H: 2-0
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer holds a 2–0 lead over Nana Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer won the 1997 Oklahoma third round 4-6 3-5 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 1997* | Oklahoma | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 4-6 3-5 (ret.) | Nana Smith | Match data |
| Sep 19, 1991* | Tokyo Nichirei | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 6-4 6-3 | Nana Smith | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Nana Smith | #669 | #51 | 332 | 1,649 | 65 | 114 | 36.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Nana Smith | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #113 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #144 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #317 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #128 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #105 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #134 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |