H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer vs Nancy Feber H2H: 1-1
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer and Nancy Feber are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nancy Feber leads 1–0 on grass, while Marianne Werdel Witmeyer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nancy Feber won the 1994 Wimbledon second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 50
Left-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 1994* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Nancy Feber | 6-4 6-4 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
| Apr 15, 1993* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 6-4 6-2 | Nancy Feber | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Nancy Feber | #589 | #79 | 219 | 1,567 | 25 | 47 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Nancy Feber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #124 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #177 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |