H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Marianne Werdel Witmeyer vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 1-1

Marianne Werdel Witmeyer and Nathalie Herreman are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer won the 1993 Key Biscayne round of 128 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marianne Werdel Witmeyer
USA
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer 6-1 6-4 Nathalie Herreman #146 Match data Mar 13, 1993* R128 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Nathalie Herreman #134 6-3 6-4 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer Match data Jan 3, 1990* R64 Brisbane International Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer — — — 1,850 181 203 47.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Marianne Werdel Witmeyer Nathalie Herreman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0
1985 6–3 66.7% — 1,541 0 1 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0
1986 13–10 56.5% — 1,683 0 1 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0
1987 10–17 37.0% — 1,659 0 1 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1
1988 11–20 35.5% — 1,586 0 1 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1
1989 13–17 43.3% — 1,592 0 1 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1
1990 18–18 50.0% — 1,745 0 1 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1
1991 21–19 52.5% — 1,739 0 1 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1
1992 13–17 43.3% — 1,697 0 1 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1
1993 21–18 53.8% — 1,748 0 1 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1
1994 22–22 50.0% — 1,773 0 1 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1
1995 20–18 52.6% — 1,787 0 1 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1
1996 8–18 30.8% — 1,665 0 1 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1
1997 5–4 55.6% — 1,673 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Marianne Werdel Witmeyer Nathalie Herreman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1983 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
1984 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1985 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
1986 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
1987 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
1988 9 16 25 36.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
1989 11 14 25 44.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1990 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
1991 16 11 27 59.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
1992 11 12 23 47.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
1993 14 10 24 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
1994 15 13 28 53.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
1995 14 11 25 56.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
1996 3 10 13 23.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1997 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 125 129 254 49.2% 7 20 27 25.9% 11 20 31 35.5% 33 33 66 50.0% Career 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Marianne Werdel Witmeyer Nathalie Herreman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1983 1492 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.02 1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01
1984 1478 96.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.29 1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65
1985 1542 112.3 — — — — +15 — — 63.2% +0.89 1–0 0–1 — +0.37 1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16
1986 1683 123.1 — — — — +21 — — 50.0% -0.34 8–2 (80%) 5–1 (83%) — +1.30 1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91
1987 1659 129.2 — — — — +44 — -85 41.9% -0.77 2–6 (25%) 3–0 (100%) — -0.83 1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39
1988 1587 119.6 — — — — +2 — -37 37.3% -1.03 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -1.05 1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60
1989 1592 119.9 — — — — -6 — — 44.1% -0.25 4–4 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.6 +2.41 1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90
1990 1746 136.3 — — — — +8 -257 — 51.7% +0.10 7–10 (41%) 6–4 (60%) 103.1 -0.70 1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56
1991 1740 132.5 — — — — +15 -243 -169 48.9% -0.13 10–4 (71%) 5–4 (56%) 103.3 +0.98 1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70
1992 1697 133.3 — — — — +32 — -146 48.5% 0.00 3–7 (30%) 4–1 (80%) 98.1 +0.32 1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07
1993 1749 139.9 — — — — +28 -270 -150 51.6% +0.31 8–5 (62%) 2–2 (50%) 101.6 -0.37 1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27
1994 1773 143.7 — — — — +15 -260 -181 48.5% -0.08 9–6 (60%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.29 1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45
1995 1788 149.0 — — — — +45 -292 — 54.1% +0.31 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) 101.2 +0.06 1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34
1996 1666 124.9 — — — — +54 -192 — 31.6% -1.28 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — +0.43 1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22
1997 1673 119.1 — — — — +35 — — 52.6% +0.37 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1850 139.7 — — — — +22 -251 -124 47.3% -0.20 63–57 (53%) 39–25 (61%) 108.6 +0.74 Career 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.