H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer vs Neige Dias H2H: 0-2
Neige Dias holds a 2–0 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Neige Dias leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Neige Dias won the 1988 Phoenix third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 1988* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Neige Dias | 7-5 6-2 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
| Aug 17, 1987 | Toronto | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Neige Dias | 6-1 6-2 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Neige Dias | — | — | — | 1,748 | 75 | 75 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Neige Dias | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 19–19 | 50.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 25–13 | 65.8% | — | 1,712 | 0 | 2 |
| 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 9–10 | 47.4% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 2 |
| 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |