H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer vs Patty Fendick H2H: 0-1
Patty Fendick holds a 1–0 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Patty Fendick leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Patty Fendick won the 1994 Philadelphia third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 1994* | Philadelphia | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Patty Fendick | 6-2 6-4 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Patty Fendick | #360 | #19 | 55 | 1,883 | 199 | 162 | 55.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Patty Fendick | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #120 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #79 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #22 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #31 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 |
| 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 |
| 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 |
| 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,839 | 0 | 3 |
| 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #50 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 |
| 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |