H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer vs Silke Meier H2H: 1-1
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer and Silke Meier are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer leads 1–0 on clay, while Silke Meier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer won the 1996 German Open second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 58
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 1996* | German Open | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 6-4 6-4 | Silke Meier | Match data |
| Feb 26, 1987* | Key Biscayne | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Silke Meier | 1-6 6-2 6-3 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Silke Meier | #948 | #40 | 101 | 1,667 | 81 | 141 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Silke Meier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #50 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #132 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #138 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #80 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #151 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #113 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #91 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #205 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |