H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Marie Christine Calleja vs Isabelle Demongeot H2H: 1-2
Isabelle Demongeot holds a 2–1 lead over Marie Christine Calleja in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Isabelle Demongeot leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Isabelle Demongeot won the 1987 Los Angeles second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 62
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 59
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 1987* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Isabelle Demongeot | 6-2 6-3 | Marie Christine Calleja | Match data |
| May 6, 1987* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Marie Christine Calleja | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | Isabelle Demongeot | Match data |
| May 9, 1986* | Barcelona | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Isabelle Demongeot | 6-3 6-1 | Marie Christine Calleja | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marie Christine Calleja | — | — | — | 1,644 | 45 | 77 | 36.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Isabelle Demongeot | #522 | #35 | 69 | 1,850 | 119 | 156 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marie Christine Calleja | Isabelle Demongeot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1980 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #135 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 9–13 | 40.9% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #53 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #46 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #78 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #63 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #136 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #150 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #160 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #242 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |