H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Marie Christine Calleja vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 1-1

Marie Christine Calleja and Nathalie Herreman are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marie Christine Calleja leads 1–0 on grass, while Nathalie Herreman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nathalie Herreman won the 1989 Oklahoma third round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marie Christine Calleja
Age 62
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 2, 1989* Oklahoma WTA 250 R32 Hard Nathalie Herreman #84 6-2 6-3 Marie Christine Calleja Match data
Jun 27, 1984* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Marie Christine Calleja 5-7 6-3 6-2 Nathalie Herreman #82 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marie Christine Calleja — — — 1,644 45 77 36.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,728 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marie Christine Calleja Nathalie Herreman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1980 5–10 33.3% — 1,477 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
17 1981 4–7 36.4% — 1,477 0 0 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,548 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,564 0 0
19 1983 3–6 33.3% — 1,510 0 0 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,543 0 0
20 1984 9–13 40.9% — 1,557 0 0 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,718 0 1
21 1985 4–8 33.3% — 1,568 0 0 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,641 0 1
22 1986 7–9 43.8% — 1,630 0 0 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,606 0 1
23 1987 6–12 33.3% — 1,593 0 0 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1
24 1988 6–10 37.5% — 1,533 0 0 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,684 0 1
25 1989 1–2 33.3% — 1,534 0 0 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,619 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,622 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1