H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Marie Pinterova vs Iris Riedel Kuhn H2H: 2-3
Iris Riedel Kuhn holds a 3–2 lead over Marie Pinterova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Iris Riedel Kuhn leads 3–2 on clay. Most recently, Marie Pinterova won the 1982 Berlin second round 7-5 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 79
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
3
5 main draw meetings
Age 72
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 1982* | Berlin | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Marie Pinterova | 7-5 6-0 | Iris Riedel Kuhn | Match data |
| May 20, 1981* | Berlin | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Iris Riedel Kuhn | 6-1 4-6 6-1 | Marie Pinterova | Match data |
| Jul 12, 1980* | Neumunster | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Marie Pinterova | 6-4 6-2 | Iris Riedel Kuhn | Match data |
| May 22, 1975* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Iris Riedel Kuhn | 6-4 7-5 | Marie Pinterova | Match data |
| Mar 8, 1975* | Cairo | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Iris Riedel Kuhn | 4-6 7-6 6-0 | Marie Pinterova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marie Pinterova | — | — | — | 1,782 | 136 | 147 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Iris Riedel Kuhn | — | — | — | 1,845 | 104 | 96 | 52.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marie Pinterova | Iris Riedel Kuhn | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1968 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 16–13 | 55.2% | — | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1969 | 16–7 | 69.6% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1970 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 13–14 | 48.1% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1971 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 7 | 1978 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1972 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 8 | 1979 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1973 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 9 | 1980 | 28–9 | 75.7% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1974 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,711 | 0 | 10 | 1981 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 1975 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 10 | 1982 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 1977 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1978 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1980 | 37–18 | 67.3% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1981 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1982 | 3–16 | 15.8% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |